TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting survival in patients receiving continuous flow left ventricular assist devices
T2 - The Heartmate II risk score
AU - Cowger, Jennifer
AU - Sundareswaran, Kartik
AU - Rogers, Joseph G.
AU - Park, Soon J.
AU - Pagani, Francis D.
AU - Bhat, Geetha
AU - Jaski, Brian
AU - Farrar, David J.
AU - Slaughter, Mark S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Cowger has received honoraria from Thoratec ($10,000). Dr. Park received research and training grant support from Thoratec (>$10,000). Dr. Rogers has served as a consultant for Thoratec (>$10,000). Dr. Pagani has received grant support from Terumo and HeartWare (both $10,000). Drs. Farrar and Sundareswaran are employees of the Thoratec Corporation. Drs. Jaski and Bhat have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
PY - 2013/1/22
Y1 - 2013/1/22
N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to derive and validate a model to predict survival in candidates for HeartMate II (HMII) (Thoratec, Pleasanton, California) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Background: LVAD mortality risk prediction is important for candidate selection and communicating expectations to patients and clinicians. With the evolution of LVAD support, prior risk prediction models have become less valid. Methods: Patients enrolled into the HMII bridge to transplantation and destination therapy trials (N = 1,122) were randomly divided into derivation (DC) (n = 583) and validation cohorts (VC) (n = 539). Pre-operative candidate predictors of 90-day mortality were examined in the DC with logistic regression, from which the HMII Risk Score (HMRS) was derived. The HMRS was then applied to the VC. Results: There were 149 (13%) deaths within 90 days. In the DC, mortality (n = 80) was higher in older patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 1.7 per 10 years), those with greater hypoalbuminemia (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.76 per mg/dl of albumin), renal dysfunction (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.2 per mg/dl creatinine), coagulopathy (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.7 to 5.8 per international normalized ratio unit), and in those receiving LVAD support at less experienced centers (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2 to 4.4 for <15 trial patients). Mortality in the DC low, medium, and high HMRS groups was 4%, 16%, and 29%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the VC, corresponding mortality was 8%, 11%, and 25%, respectively (p < 0.001). HMRS discrimination was good (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.75). Conclusions: The HMRS might be useful for mortality risk stratification in HMII candidates and may serve as an additional tool in the patient selection process.
AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to derive and validate a model to predict survival in candidates for HeartMate II (HMII) (Thoratec, Pleasanton, California) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Background: LVAD mortality risk prediction is important for candidate selection and communicating expectations to patients and clinicians. With the evolution of LVAD support, prior risk prediction models have become less valid. Methods: Patients enrolled into the HMII bridge to transplantation and destination therapy trials (N = 1,122) were randomly divided into derivation (DC) (n = 583) and validation cohorts (VC) (n = 539). Pre-operative candidate predictors of 90-day mortality were examined in the DC with logistic regression, from which the HMII Risk Score (HMRS) was derived. The HMRS was then applied to the VC. Results: There were 149 (13%) deaths within 90 days. In the DC, mortality (n = 80) was higher in older patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 1.7 per 10 years), those with greater hypoalbuminemia (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.76 per mg/dl of albumin), renal dysfunction (OR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4 to 3.2 per mg/dl creatinine), coagulopathy (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.7 to 5.8 per international normalized ratio unit), and in those receiving LVAD support at less experienced centers (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2 to 4.4 for <15 trial patients). Mortality in the DC low, medium, and high HMRS groups was 4%, 16%, and 29%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the VC, corresponding mortality was 8%, 11%, and 25%, respectively (p < 0.001). HMRS discrimination was good (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.75). Conclusions: The HMRS might be useful for mortality risk stratification in HMII candidates and may serve as an additional tool in the patient selection process.
KW - heart failure
KW - left ventricular assist device
KW - mortality
KW - risk
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872283890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872283890&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.055
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.055
M3 - Article
C2 - 23265328
AN - SCOPUS:84872283890
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 61
SP - 313
EP - 321
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 3
ER -