Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Postmarket Drug Safety−Related Actions Before and After the US Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act

  • Harry Doernberg
  • , Joshua D. Wallach
  • , Molly M. Jeffery
  • , Maryam Mooghali
  • , Reshma Ramachandran
  • , Joseph S. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Importance The 2007 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Amendments Act (FDAAA) expanded its safety-related regulatory authorities, including enhanced postmarketing safety surveillance and new clinical study requirements. However, whether FDAAA has been associated with differences in the frequency and timing of postmarket safety-related actions remains poorly understood. Objectives To assess whether FDAAA was associated with differences in time to first FDA postmarket drug safety−related action, and to assess whether therapeutic and regulatory characteristics were associated with differences in time to these actions post-FDAAA implementation. Design and Setting This was a cross-sectional study of all novel therapeutics approved by FDA between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2019, and followed up through December 31, 2024. Approvals were categorized as pre- or post-FDAAA (before or after March 25, 2008). Post-FDAAA therapeutic and regulatory characteristics included drug class, therapeutic area, orphan status, special regulatory pathway, and presence of a boxed warning or FDAAA-mandated postmarket study requirement at approval. Main Outcomes and Measures Time to first FDA postmarket drug safety−related action, a composite of withdrawals due to safety concerns, incremental boxed warnings, and safety-related communications. Results Of the 560 novel therapeutics approved, FDA took postmarket safety-related actions for 130 (23.2%) during a median (IQR) follow-up of 12.1 (7.8-18.2) years. These comprised actions within 5 years of approval for 34 of 164 therapeutics (20.7%) approved pre-FDAAA, and 57 of 396 (14.4%) approved post-FDAAA (rate ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.02; P =.06). Compared to pre-FDAAA approvals, after accounting for therapeutic and regulatory characteristics, there was no statistically significant difference in time to first postmarket safety-related action for post-FDAAA approvals (time ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.15-1.07; P =.07). However, among therapeutics with postmarket safety-related actions within 5 years of approval, median time to first action was shorter post-FDAAA (median [IQR], 3.1 (2.0-4.2) years for pre-FDAAA vs 1.8 [1.3-2.5] years post-FDAAA; P =.004). Among 260 novel therapeutics approved post-FDAAA, after the October 2013 enactment of breakthrough therapy designation, the following therapeutic and regulatory characteristics were associated with time to first postmarket safety-related action: small molecule type (time ratio, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.81; P =.02), orphan designation (time ratio, 8.29; 95% CI, 2.43-28.27; P <.001), fast track (time ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.64; P =.005), breakthrough therapy designation (time ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03-0.32; P <.001), prolonged regulatory review time (>400 days; time ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.73; P =.02), and FDAAA-mandated postmarket study requirements at approval (time ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.80; P =.01). Conclusions and Relevance This cross-sectional analysis found that the enhanced safety-related regulatory authorities of FDAAA were not associated with differences in time to first postmarket safety-related action. However, among therapeutics with postmarket safety-related actions within 5 years of approval, median time to first action was shorter post-FDAAA implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-242
Number of pages10
JournalJAMA Internal Medicine
Volume186
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2 2026

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Postmarket Drug Safety−Related Actions Before and After the US Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this