TY - JOUR
T1 - Periprocedural cardiopulmonary bypass or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra
AU - Patlolla, Sri Harsha
AU - Sandhyavenu, Harigopal
AU - Vallabhajosyula, Saarwaani
AU - Barsness, Gregory W.
AU - Dunlay, Shannon M.
AU - Greason, Kevin L.
AU - Holmes, David R.
AU - Eleid, Mackram F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Authors.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background—There are limited data on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to provide hemodynamic support periprocedurally during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This study sought to evaluate patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant use of CPB/VA-ECMO. Methods and Results—We systematically reviewed the published literature from 2000 to 2018 for studies evaluating adult patients requiring CPB/VA-ECMO periprocedurally during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Studies reporting short-term and long-term mortality were included. Given the significant methodological and statistical differences between published studies, meta-analysis of the association of CPB/VA-ECMO with mortality was not performed. Of the 537 studies identified, 9 studies representing 5191 patients met our inclusion criteria. Median ages were between 75 and 87 years with 33% to 75% male patients. Where reported, the Edwards SAPIEN™ transcatheter heart valve was the most frequently used. A total of 203 (3.9%) patients received periprocedural hemodynamic support with CPB/VA-ECMO. Common indications for CPB/VA-ECMO included left ventricular or aortic annular rupture, rapid hemodynamic deterioration, aortic regurgitation, cardiac arrest, and left main coronary artery obstruction. The use of CPB/VA-ECMO was predominantly an emergent strategy and was used for durations of 1 to 2 hours. Short-term mortality (in-hospital and 30-day) was 29.8%, and 1-year mortality was 52.4%. Major complications such as bleeding, vascular injury, tamponade, stroke, and renal failure were noted in 10% to 50% of patients. Conclusions—CPB/VA-ECMO was used in 4% in the early experience of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, most commonly for periprocedural complications. There are limited data on preprocedural planned use of VA-ECMO, and the characteristics of this population remain poorly defined.
AB - Background—There are limited data on the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) to provide hemodynamic support periprocedurally during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This study sought to evaluate patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant use of CPB/VA-ECMO. Methods and Results—We systematically reviewed the published literature from 2000 to 2018 for studies evaluating adult patients requiring CPB/VA-ECMO periprocedurally during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Studies reporting short-term and long-term mortality were included. Given the significant methodological and statistical differences between published studies, meta-analysis of the association of CPB/VA-ECMO with mortality was not performed. Of the 537 studies identified, 9 studies representing 5191 patients met our inclusion criteria. Median ages were between 75 and 87 years with 33% to 75% male patients. Where reported, the Edwards SAPIEN™ transcatheter heart valve was the most frequently used. A total of 203 (3.9%) patients received periprocedural hemodynamic support with CPB/VA-ECMO. Common indications for CPB/VA-ECMO included left ventricular or aortic annular rupture, rapid hemodynamic deterioration, aortic regurgitation, cardiac arrest, and left main coronary artery obstruction. The use of CPB/VA-ECMO was predominantly an emergent strategy and was used for durations of 1 to 2 hours. Short-term mortality (in-hospital and 30-day) was 29.8%, and 1-year mortality was 52.4%. Major complications such as bleeding, vascular injury, tamponade, stroke, and renal failure were noted in 10% to 50% of patients. Conclusions—CPB/VA-ECMO was used in 4% in the early experience of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, most commonly for periprocedural complications. There are limited data on preprocedural planned use of VA-ECMO, and the characteristics of this population remain poorly defined.
KW - Cardiogenic shock
KW - Cardiopulmonary bypass
KW - Critical care
KW - Mechanical circulatory support
KW - Transcatheter valve implantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050489358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050489358&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.118.009608
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.118.009608
M3 - Article
C2 - 29987125
AN - SCOPUS:85050489358
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 7
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 14
M1 - e009608
ER -