TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient-Centered Appointment Scheduling
T2 - a Call for Autonomy, Continuity, and Creativity
AU - Matulis, John C.
AU - McCoy, Rozalina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Society of General Internal Medicine.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - When making an appointment, patients are generally unaware of how much clinician time is available to address their concerns. Similarly, the primary care clinician is often unaware of what the patient expects to accomplish during the visit, leading to uncertainty about how much time they can allot to each sequentially appearing concern, and whether they can reasonably expect to address necessary preventive services and chronic disease management. Neither patient nor clinician expectations can be adequately managed through standardized scheduling templates, which assign a fixed appointment length based on a single stated reason for the visit. As such, standardized appointment scheduling may contribute to inefficient use of valuable face-to-face time, patient and clinician dissatisfaction, and low-value care. Herein, we suggest several potential mechanisms for improving the scheduling process, including (1) entrusting scheduling to the primary care team; (2) advance visit planning; (3) pro-active engagement of ancillary team members including behavioral health, nursing, social work, and pharmacy; and (4) application of innovative, technologically advanced solutions such as telehealth and artificial intelligence to the scheduling process. These changes have the potential to improve efficiency, patient and clinician satisfaction, and health outcomes, while decreasing low-value testing and return visits for unaddressed concerns.
AB - When making an appointment, patients are generally unaware of how much clinician time is available to address their concerns. Similarly, the primary care clinician is often unaware of what the patient expects to accomplish during the visit, leading to uncertainty about how much time they can allot to each sequentially appearing concern, and whether they can reasonably expect to address necessary preventive services and chronic disease management. Neither patient nor clinician expectations can be adequately managed through standardized scheduling templates, which assign a fixed appointment length based on a single stated reason for the visit. As such, standardized appointment scheduling may contribute to inefficient use of valuable face-to-face time, patient and clinician dissatisfaction, and low-value care. Herein, we suggest several potential mechanisms for improving the scheduling process, including (1) entrusting scheduling to the primary care team; (2) advance visit planning; (3) pro-active engagement of ancillary team members including behavioral health, nursing, social work, and pharmacy; and (4) application of innovative, technologically advanced solutions such as telehealth and artificial intelligence to the scheduling process. These changes have the potential to improve efficiency, patient and clinician satisfaction, and health outcomes, while decreasing low-value testing and return visits for unaddressed concerns.
KW - appointments and schedules
KW - call center
KW - healthcare quality
KW - primary healthcare
KW - professional autonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090220703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090220703&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11606-020-06058-9
DO - 10.1007/s11606-020-06058-9
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32885369
AN - SCOPUS:85090220703
SN - 0884-8734
VL - 36
SP - 511
EP - 514
JO - Journal of general internal medicine
JF - Journal of general internal medicine
IS - 2
ER -