TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of patients with submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma
T2 - a multicenter cohort study
AU - Otaki, Fouad
AU - Ma, Gene K.
AU - Krigel, Anna
AU - Dierkhising, Ross A.
AU - Lewis, Jason T.
AU - Blevins, Christopher H.
AU - Gopalakrishnan, Naveen P.
AU - Ravindran, Adharsh
AU - Johnson, Michele L.
AU - Leggett, Cadman L.
AU - Wigle, Denis
AU - Wang, Kenneth K.
AU - Falk, Gary W.
AU - Abrams, Julian A.
AU - Nakagawa, Hiroshi
AU - Rustgi, Anil K.
AU - Wang, Timothy C.
AU - Lightdale, Charles J.
AU - Ginsberg, Gregory G.
AU - Iyer, Prasad G.
N1 - Funding Information:
DISCLOSURE: The following author received research support for this study from the National Institutes of Health (grants U54 CA163004 and R01 CA241164 ): P. G. Iyer. In addition, the following authors disclosed financial relationships: C. L. Leggett: Research funding from Nine Point Medical . K. K. Wang: Research funding from Nine Point Medical, C2 Therapeutics , and CSA Medical . G. Falk: consultant for Interpace and Cernostics; J. A. Abrams: Consultant for C2 Therapeutics. C. J. Lightdale: Consultant for C2 Therapeutics, CDX Diagnostics, and Boston Scientific. P. G. Iyer: Research funding from C2 Therapeutics, Nine Point Medical, Exact Sciences , and Pentax Medical ; consultant for Medtronic, CSA Medical, and Symple Surgical. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Background and Aims: The treatment of submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains in evolution, with some evidence supporting endoscopic management of low-risk lesions. Using a multicenter cohort, we evaluated outcomes of patients with T1b EAC and predictors of survival. Methods: Patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2016 with T1b EAC were identified from 3 academic medical centers in the United States. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Outcomes studied were overall and cancer-free survival. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess independent predictors of survival. Results: One hundred forty-one patients were included, of whom 68 (48%) underwent esophagectomy and 73 (52%) were treated endoscopically. Most patients (85.8%) had high-risk histologic features. Thirty-day operative mortality was 2.9%. Median follow-up in the esophagectomy and endoscopic cohorts was 49.4 and 43.4 months, respectively. Patients treated endoscopically were older with higher comorbidity scores, with 46 (63%) achieving histologic remission. Nineteen patients (26.0%) also received chemoradiation. Five-year overall survival rates in the surgical and endoscopic cohorts were 89% and 59%, respectively, whereas 5-year cancer-free survival rates were 92% and 69%. Presence of high-risk histologic features was associated with reduced overall survival. Conclusions: In this large multicenter study of patients with T1b EAC, esophagectomy was associated with improved overall but not cancer-free survival. High-risk histologic features were associated with poorer survival.
AB - Background and Aims: The treatment of submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remains in evolution, with some evidence supporting endoscopic management of low-risk lesions. Using a multicenter cohort, we evaluated outcomes of patients with T1b EAC and predictors of survival. Methods: Patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2016 with T1b EAC were identified from 3 academic medical centers in the United States. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were collected. Outcomes studied were overall and cancer-free survival. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to assess independent predictors of survival. Results: One hundred forty-one patients were included, of whom 68 (48%) underwent esophagectomy and 73 (52%) were treated endoscopically. Most patients (85.8%) had high-risk histologic features. Thirty-day operative mortality was 2.9%. Median follow-up in the esophagectomy and endoscopic cohorts was 49.4 and 43.4 months, respectively. Patients treated endoscopically were older with higher comorbidity scores, with 46 (63%) achieving histologic remission. Nineteen patients (26.0%) also received chemoradiation. Five-year overall survival rates in the surgical and endoscopic cohorts were 89% and 59%, respectively, whereas 5-year cancer-free survival rates were 92% and 69%. Presence of high-risk histologic features was associated with reduced overall survival. Conclusions: In this large multicenter study of patients with T1b EAC, esophagectomy was associated with improved overall but not cancer-free survival. High-risk histologic features were associated with poorer survival.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083089499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083089499&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 31953189
AN - SCOPUS:85083089499
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 92
SP - 31-39.e1
JO - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -