Optimized Surveillance Intervals Following Endoscopic Eradication of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: An International Cohort Study

Allon Kahn, Julia Crook, Michael G. Heckman, Mikolaj A. Wieczorek, Sarmed Sami, Diana Snyder, Siddharth Agarwal, Jose Santiago, Jacobo Ortiz Fernandez-Sordo, W. Keith Tan, Ramona Lansing, Kenneth K. Wang, Krish Ragunath, Massimiliano DiPietro, Herbert Wolfsen, Francisco Ramirez, David Fleischer, Cadman L. Leggett, Prasad G. Iyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Background & Aims: Recommended surveillance intervals after complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) are largely not evidence-based. Using recurrence rates in a multicenter international Barrett's esophagus (BE) CE-IM cohort, we aimed to generate optimal intervals for surveillance. Methods: Patients with dysplastic BE undergoing EET and achieving CE-IM from prospectively maintained databases at 5 tertiary-care centers in the United States and the United Kingdom were included. The cumulative incidence of recurrence was estimated, accounting for the unknown date of actual recurrence that lies between the dates of current and previous endoscopy. This cumulative incidence of recurrence subsequently was used to estimate the proportion of patients with undetected recurrence for various surveillance intervals over 5 years. Intervals were selected that minimized recurrences remaining undetected for more than 6 months. Actual patterns of post–CE-IM follow-up evaluation are described. Results: A total of 498 patients (with baseline low-grade dysplasia, 115 patients; high-grade dysplasia [HGD], 288 patients; and intramucosal adenocarcinoma [IMCa], 95 patients) were included. Any recurrence occurred in 27.1% and dysplastic recurrence occurred in 8.4% over a median of 2.6 years of follow-up evaluation. For pre-ablation HGD/IMCa, intervals of 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and then annually, resulted in no patients with dysplastic recurrence undetected for more than 6 months, comparable with current guideline recommendations despite a 33% reduction in the number of surveillance endoscopies. For pre-ablation low-grade dysplasia, intervals of 1, 2, and 4 years balanced endoscopic burden and undetected recurrence risk. Conclusions: Lengthening post–CE-IM surveillance intervals would reduce the endoscopic burden after CE-IM with comparable rates of recurrent HGD/IMCa. Future guidelines should consider reduced surveillance frequency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2763-2771.e3
JournalClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2022


  • Adenocarcinoma
  • Barrett's Esophagus
  • Esophagus
  • Surveillance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology


Dive into the research topics of 'Optimized Surveillance Intervals Following Endoscopic Eradication of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: An International Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this