Abstract
Background: Although some clinical reports suggest patient-specific instrumentation in TKA may improve alignment, reduce surgical time, and lower hospital costs, it is unknown whether it improves pain- and function-related outcomes and gait. Questions/purposes: We hypothesized that TKA performed with patient-specific instrumentation would improve patient-reported outcomes measured by validated scoring tools and level gait as ascertained with three-dimensional (3-D) analysis compared with conventional instrumentation 3 months after surgery. Methods: We randomized 40 patients into two groups using either patient-specific instrumentation or conventional instrumentation. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months after surgery. Assessment tools included subjective functional outcome and quality-of-life (QOL) scores using validated questionnaires (New Knee Society Score
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2468-2476 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Clinical orthopaedics and related research |
| Volume | 472 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2014 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: A randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS