TY - JOUR
T1 - Model for predicting breast cancer risk in women with atypical hyperplasia
AU - Degnim, Amy C.
AU - Winham, Stacey J.
AU - Frank, Ryan D.
AU - Pankratz, V. Shane
AU - Dupont, William D.
AU - Vierkant, Robert A.
AU - Frost, Marlene H.
AU - Hoskin, Tanya L.
AU - Vachon, Celine M.
AU - Ghosh, Karthik
AU - Hieken, Tina J.
AU - Carter, Jodi M.
AU - Denison, Lori A.
AU - Broderick, Brendan
AU - Hartmann, Lynn C.
AU - Visscher, Daniel W.
AU - Radisky, Derek C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant No. CA187112, the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer—Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE CA116201), and Susan B. Komen Grant No. KG110542. We thank Teresa Allers and Joanne Johnson for data collection and Marilyn Churchward for assistance in manuscript preparation.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/6/20
Y1 - 2018/6/20
N2 - Purpose Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) on breast biopsy have an aggregate increased risk of breast cancer (BC), but existing risk prediction models do not provide accurate individualized estimates of risk in this subset of high-risk women. Here, we used the Mayo benign breast disease cohort to develop and validate a model of BC risk prediction that is specifically for women with AH, which we have designated as AH-BC. Patients and Methods Retrospective cohorts of women age 18 to 85 years with pathologically confirmed benign AH from Rochester, MN, and Nashville, TN, were used for model development and external validation, respectively. Clinical risk factors and histologic features of the tissue biopsy were selected using L1-penalized Cox proportional hazards regression. Identified features were included in a Fine and Gray regression model to estimate BC risk, with death as a competing risk. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed in the model-building set and an external validation set. Results The model-building set consisted of 699 women with AH, 142 of whom developed BC (median follow-up, 8.1 years), and the external validation set consisted of 461 women with 114 later BC events (median follow-up, 11.4 years). The final AH-BC model included three covariates: age at biopsy, age at biopsy squared, and number of foci of AH. At 10 years, the AH-BC model demonstrated good discrimination (0.63 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.70]) and calibration (0.87 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.24]). In the external validation set, the model showed acceptable discrimination (0.59 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.67]) and calibration (0.91 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.42]). Conclusion We have created a new model with which to refine BC risk prediction for women with AH. The AH-BC model demonstrates good discrimination and calibration, and it validates in an external data set.
AB - Purpose Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) on breast biopsy have an aggregate increased risk of breast cancer (BC), but existing risk prediction models do not provide accurate individualized estimates of risk in this subset of high-risk women. Here, we used the Mayo benign breast disease cohort to develop and validate a model of BC risk prediction that is specifically for women with AH, which we have designated as AH-BC. Patients and Methods Retrospective cohorts of women age 18 to 85 years with pathologically confirmed benign AH from Rochester, MN, and Nashville, TN, were used for model development and external validation, respectively. Clinical risk factors and histologic features of the tissue biopsy were selected using L1-penalized Cox proportional hazards regression. Identified features were included in a Fine and Gray regression model to estimate BC risk, with death as a competing risk. Model discrimination and calibration were assessed in the model-building set and an external validation set. Results The model-building set consisted of 699 women with AH, 142 of whom developed BC (median follow-up, 8.1 years), and the external validation set consisted of 461 women with 114 later BC events (median follow-up, 11.4 years). The final AH-BC model included three covariates: age at biopsy, age at biopsy squared, and number of foci of AH. At 10 years, the AH-BC model demonstrated good discrimination (0.63 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.70]) and calibration (0.87 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.24]). In the external validation set, the model showed acceptable discrimination (0.59 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.67]) and calibration (0.91 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.42]). Conclusion We have created a new model with which to refine BC risk prediction for women with AH. The AH-BC model demonstrates good discrimination and calibration, and it validates in an external data set.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052374949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052374949&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9480
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9480
M3 - Article
C2 - 29676945
AN - SCOPUS:85052374949
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 36
SP - 1840
EP - 1846
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 18
ER -