Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction: A review

Francesca Bursi, Maurice Enriquez-Sarano, Steven J. Jacobsen, Véronique L. Roger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

107 Scopus citations


Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction is the result of multifactorial processes involving local and global left ventricular remodeling. The prevalence of mitral regurgitation varies from 11% to 59%. Published studies differ greatly in design, inclusion criteria, duration of follow-up, and technique of mitral regurgitation assessment. However, they consistently indicate that mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction carries an adverse prognosis with increased risk of death and heart failure independently of previously known indicators of risk after myocardial infarction. Mitral regurgitation is often clinically silent; therefore, it should be systematically evaluated by echocardiography. Standard color Doppler imaging is a highly sensitive method to detect even mild degrees of ischemic mitral regurgitation. One unique advantage of echocardiography is that it accurately quantifies the severity of mitral regurgitation by measuring the effective regurgitant orifice area and the regurgitant volume using Doppler methodology. Therefore, the evaluation should include precise quantification of the degree of mitral regurgitation to best appraise the ensuing risk. Current medical options rely chiefly on angiotensin converting enzyme-inhibitors and beta-blocker therapy, and surgical approaches offer future promise. Both categories of therapeutic approaches should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)103-112
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 2006


  • Mechanism
  • Mitral regurgitation
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Prevalence
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction: A review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this