TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent Factor Structure of Outcome Measures Used in the HABIT® Mild Cognitive Impairment Intervention Programs
AU - Defeis, Brittany
AU - Ying, Gelan
AU - Kurasz, Andrea M.
AU - De Wit, Liselotte
AU - Amofa, Priscilla
AU - Chandler, Melanie
AU - Locke, Dona
AU - Shandera-Ochsner, Anne
AU - Phatak, Vaishali
AU - Smith, Glenn
N1 - Funding Information:
Research reported in this manuscript was partially funded through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Award (CER-1306-01897), the National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR012419), the Alzheimer’s Association (NIRG-07-58843), The Florida Department of Health Ed and Ethel Moore Alzheimer’s Disease Research Program (7AZ-01) and the Ralph C Wilson Foundation Additional support was received from the Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers at Mayo Clinic (MN and Jax; P30AG06267 and AZ P30AG01961) the University of Washington (P30AG005036) and the University of Florida (P30AG066506). The statements in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the views of any of the sources of funding.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: In Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) research, common outcome measures include cognitive and functional impairment, as well as persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) and care partner self-reported mood and quality of life. Studies commonly analyze these measures separately, which potentially leads to issues of multiple comparisons and/or multicollinearity among measures while ignoring the latent constructs they may be measuring. Objective: This study sought to examine the latent factor structure of a battery of 12-13 measures of domains mentioned above, used in a multicomponent behavioral intervention (The HABIT® program) for pwMCI and their partners. Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involved 214 pwMCI-partner pairs. Subsequent Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) used 730 pairs in both pre- and post-intervention conditions. Results: EFA generated a three-factor model. Factors could be characterized as partner adjustment (29.9%), pwMCI adjustment (18.1%), and pwMCI impairment (12.8%). The subsequent CFA confirmed our findings, and the goodness-of-fit for this model was adequate in both the pre- (CFI=0.937; RMSEA=0.057, p=0.089) and post-intervention (CFI=0.942; RMSEA=0.051, p=0.430) groups. Conclusion: Results demonstrated a stable factor structure across cohorts and intervention conditions suggesting that three broad factors may provide a straightforward and meaningful model to assess intervention outcome, at least during the MCI phase of ADRD.
AB - Background: In Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) research, common outcome measures include cognitive and functional impairment, as well as persons with mild cognitive impairment (pwMCI) and care partner self-reported mood and quality of life. Studies commonly analyze these measures separately, which potentially leads to issues of multiple comparisons and/or multicollinearity among measures while ignoring the latent constructs they may be measuring. Objective: This study sought to examine the latent factor structure of a battery of 12-13 measures of domains mentioned above, used in a multicomponent behavioral intervention (The HABIT® program) for pwMCI and their partners. Methods: Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) involved 214 pwMCI-partner pairs. Subsequent Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) used 730 pairs in both pre- and post-intervention conditions. Results: EFA generated a three-factor model. Factors could be characterized as partner adjustment (29.9%), pwMCI adjustment (18.1%), and pwMCI impairment (12.8%). The subsequent CFA confirmed our findings, and the goodness-of-fit for this model was adequate in both the pre- (CFI=0.937; RMSEA=0.057, p=0.089) and post-intervention (CFI=0.942; RMSEA=0.051, p=0.430) groups. Conclusion: Results demonstrated a stable factor structure across cohorts and intervention conditions suggesting that three broad factors may provide a straightforward and meaningful model to assess intervention outcome, at least during the MCI phase of ADRD.
KW - Behavioral intervention
KW - caregiver burden
KW - factor analysis
KW - functional status
KW - mild cognitive impairment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118939505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85118939505&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/JAD-210582
DO - 10.3233/JAD-210582
M3 - Article
C2 - 34511501
AN - SCOPUS:85118939505
SN - 1387-2877
VL - 84
SP - 193
EP - 205
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
IS - 1
ER -