TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Sublobar Resection on Pulmonary Function
T2 - Long-Term Results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4032 (Alliance)
AU - Kent, Michael S.
AU - Mandrekar, Sumithra J.
AU - Landreneau, Rodney
AU - Nichols, Francis
AU - DiPetrillo, Thomas A.
AU - Meyers, Bryan
AU - Heron, Dwight E.
AU - Jones, David R.
AU - Tan, Angelina D.
AU - Starnes, Sandra
AU - Putnam, Joe B.
AU - Fernando, Hiran C.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U10CA180821 and U10CA180882 to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, as well as CA076001 to the legacy American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG), and grants U10CA180790, U10CA180791, U10CA180833, and U10CA180844.
Funding Information:
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U10CA180821 and U10CA180882 to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, as well as CA076001 to the legacy American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG), and grants U10CA180790, U10CA180791, U10CA180833, and U10CA180844. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Background. Sublobar resection (SR) in high-risk operable patients may result in a long-term decrease in pulmonary function. We previously reported 3-month pulmonary function outcomes from a randomized phase III study of SR alone compared with SR with brachytherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We now report long-term pulmonary function after SR. Methods. Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. A decline of 10% or more from baseline in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume of 1 percentage or in the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was considered clinically meaningful. The effect of study arm, tumor location, size, approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy), and SR type (wedge vs segmentectomy) on pulmonary function was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of each factor on longitudinal data, including all four time points. Results. Complete pulmonary function data at all time points was available in 69 patients. No significant differences were observed in pulmonary function between SR and SR with brachytherapy, thus the study arms were combined for all analyses. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.02) in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was demonstrated for lower-lobe resections at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.05) in the percentage predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was seen for thoracotomy at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. Conclusions. Clinically meaningful declines in pulmonary function occurred after lower lobe resection and after thoracotomy at 3 months but subsequently recovered. This study suggests that SR does not result in sustained decreased pulmonary function in high-risk operable patients.
AB - Background. Sublobar resection (SR) in high-risk operable patients may result in a long-term decrease in pulmonary function. We previously reported 3-month pulmonary function outcomes from a randomized phase III study of SR alone compared with SR with brachytherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. We now report long-term pulmonary function after SR. Methods. Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. A decline of 10% or more from baseline in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume of 1 percentage or in the diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was considered clinically meaningful. The effect of study arm, tumor location, size, approach (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery vs thoracotomy), and SR type (wedge vs segmentectomy) on pulmonary function was assessed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. A generalized estimating equation model was used to assess the effect of each factor on longitudinal data, including all four time points. Results. Complete pulmonary function data at all time points was available in 69 patients. No significant differences were observed in pulmonary function between SR and SR with brachytherapy, thus the study arms were combined for all analyses. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.02) in the percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was demonstrated for lower-lobe resections at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. A decline of 10% or more (p = 0.05) in the percentage predicted diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide was seen for thoracotomy at 3 months but was not at 12 or 24 months. Conclusions. Clinically meaningful declines in pulmonary function occurred after lower lobe resection and after thoracotomy at 3 months but subsequently recovered. This study suggests that SR does not result in sustained decreased pulmonary function in high-risk operable patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963847215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963847215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.069
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.069
M3 - Article
C2 - 27101728
AN - SCOPUS:84963847215
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 102
SP - 230
EP - 238
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -