Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients

Stanley P.L. Leong, Neil A. Accortt, Richard Essner, Merrick Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Barbara Pockaj, Harald J. Hoekstra, Carlos Garberoglio, Richard L. White, David Chu, Merrill Biel, Kim Charney, Harold Wanebo, Eli Avisar, John Vetto, Seng Jaw Soong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations


Objective: To determine the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) status and other risk factorsonrecurrence and overall survival in head and neck melanoma patients. Design: The SLN Working Group, based in San Francisco, Calif, with its 11 member centers, the John Wayne Cancer Institute, and The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center pooled data on 629 primary head and neck melanoma patients who had selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. A total of 614 subjects were analyzable. All centers obtained internal review board approval and adhered to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 regulations. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify factors associated with overall and disease-free survival. Setting: Tertiary care medical centers. Main Outcome Measure: Clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients undergoing selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. Results: Overall, 10.1% (n=62) of the subjects had at least 1 positive node. Subjects with positive SLN status had significantly thicker tumors (mean thickness, 2.8 vs 2.1 mm; P<.001), and were more likely to have ulcerated tumors (P=.004). During the median follow-up of 3.3 years, the overall mortality from head and neck melanoma was 10%, with more than20%experiencing at least 1 recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor site was an independent predictor of mortality; location on the scalp had a more than 3-fold (P<.001) greater mortality than tumors on the face. Tumor thickness was also an independent predictor of overall survival, and SLN status was the most important predictor of disease-free survival in the multivariate model (P<.001). Tumors on the scalp had the highest rate of recurrence, while those on the neck had the lowest. Tumor ulceration was the significant predictor of time to recurrence or disease-free survival (P<.001). Conclusion: In this multicenter study, SLN status and other risk factors have an effect on recurrence and/or overall survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-373
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Issue number4
StatePublished - Apr 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology


Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this