TY - JOUR
T1 - Identifying in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE)
T2 - A comparison of claims-based approaches with the rochester epidemiology project VTE cohort
AU - Leibson, Cynthia L.
AU - Needleman, Jack
AU - Buerhaus, Peter
AU - Heit, John A.
AU - Melton, L. Joseph
AU - Naessens, James M.
AU - Bailey, Kent R.
AU - Petterson, Tanya M.
AU - Ransom, Jeanine E.
AU - Harris, Marcelline R.
PY - 2008/2
Y1 - 2008/2
N2 - BACKGROUND:: Efforts to identify hospital-acquired complications from claims data by applying exclusion rules to discharge diagnosis codes exhibit low positive predictive value (PPV). The PPV improves when a variable is added to each secondary diagnosis to indicate whether the condition was "present-on-admission" (POA) or "hospital-acquired". Such indicator variables will soon be required for Medicare reimbursement. No estimates are available, however, of the proportion of hospital-acquired complications that are missed (sensitivity) using either exclusion rules or indicator variables. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV) of claims-based approaches using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) venous thromboembolism (VTE) cohort as a "gold standard." METHODS:: All inpatient encounters by Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals 1995-1998 constituted the at-risk-population. REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE consisted of all objectively-diagnosed VTE among County residents 1995-1998, whose onset of symptoms occurred during inpatient stays at these hospitals, as confirmed by detailed review of County residents' provider-linked medical records. Claims-based approaches used billing data from these hospitals. RESULTS:: Of 37,845 inpatient encounters, 98 had REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE; 47 (48%) were medical encounters. NPV and specificity were >99% for both claims-based approaches. Although indicator variables provided higher PPV (74%) compared with exclusion rules (35%), the sensitivity for exclusion rules was 74% compared with only 38% for indicator variables. Misclassification was greater for medical than surgical encounters. CONCLUSIONS:: Utility and accuracy of claims data for identifying hospital-acquired conditions, including POA indicator variables, requires close attention be paid by clinicians and coders to what is being recorded.
AB - BACKGROUND:: Efforts to identify hospital-acquired complications from claims data by applying exclusion rules to discharge diagnosis codes exhibit low positive predictive value (PPV). The PPV improves when a variable is added to each secondary diagnosis to indicate whether the condition was "present-on-admission" (POA) or "hospital-acquired". Such indicator variables will soon be required for Medicare reimbursement. No estimates are available, however, of the proportion of hospital-acquired complications that are missed (sensitivity) using either exclusion rules or indicator variables. We estimated sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV) of claims-based approaches using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) venous thromboembolism (VTE) cohort as a "gold standard." METHODS:: All inpatient encounters by Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents at Mayo Clinic-affiliated hospitals 1995-1998 constituted the at-risk-population. REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE consisted of all objectively-diagnosed VTE among County residents 1995-1998, whose onset of symptoms occurred during inpatient stays at these hospitals, as confirmed by detailed review of County residents' provider-linked medical records. Claims-based approaches used billing data from these hospitals. RESULTS:: Of 37,845 inpatient encounters, 98 had REP-identified hospital-acquired VTE; 47 (48%) were medical encounters. NPV and specificity were >99% for both claims-based approaches. Although indicator variables provided higher PPV (74%) compared with exclusion rules (35%), the sensitivity for exclusion rules was 74% compared with only 38% for indicator variables. Misclassification was greater for medical than surgical encounters. CONCLUSIONS:: Utility and accuracy of claims data for identifying hospital-acquired conditions, including POA indicator variables, requires close attention be paid by clinicians and coders to what is being recorded.
KW - Administrative data
KW - Complications of care
KW - Presenton-admission indicator
KW - Venous thromboembolism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38549113615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38549113615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181589b92
DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181589b92
M3 - Article
C2 - 18219240
AN - SCOPUS:38549113615
SN - 0025-7079
VL - 46
SP - 127
EP - 132
JO - Medical care
JF - Medical care
IS - 2
ER -