TY - JOUR
T1 - How Do We Balance the Long-term Health of a Patient With the Short-term Risk to the Physician?
AU - Weinstock, Michael B.
AU - Mattu, Amal
AU - Hess, Erik P.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.
AB - Background: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among emergency medicine physicians; many factors weigh into the medical decision-making process including the health of the patient as well as short-term risk to the physician. Objective: The objective of our discussion is to illustrate specific scenarios where medical decisions are focused on the physician's short-term risk, then to propose an approach to shifting the balance to the patient's long-term health. Methods: Using recent data on the evaluation, disposition, and outcomes of patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department, we calculate the risk of outpatient evaluation compared to the common practice of admission or observation. Results: Patients with low-risk chest pain and negative initial evaluation in the emergency department with 2 normal cardiac biomarkers, normal vital signs, and non-ischemic, interpretable ECGs, have an extremely low-risk of a short term clinically relevant adverse cardiac event. There is a suggestion of a higher patient risk from admission, prompting consideration that continued evaluation of the chest pain as an outpatient may be safer than admission or observation. Conclusion: A test/intervention should be done if the risk of a missed diagnosis or adverse outcome is greater that the risk of the test/intervention. Involving the patient in the decision-making process may help to shift the management balance from the physician's short-term concern of their own risk, to the patient's long-term health.
KW - Chest pain
KW - Medical decision making
KW - Risk to patient
KW - Shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028595631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028595631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.010
DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.06.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 28870390
AN - SCOPUS:85028595631
SN - 0736-4679
JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine
ER -