Abstract
Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with≤4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≥ 1.0 × 10-5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11- 284F21.8, respectively (P ≥ 7.1 × 10-6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≥6 × 10-3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novelEOCtherapies.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5264-5276 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Clinical Cancer Research |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 23 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 1 2015 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Ovarian Cancer Outcomes: Findings from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Clinical Cancer Research, Vol. 21, No. 23, 01.12.2015, p. 5264-5276.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Ovarian Cancer Outcomes
T2 - Findings from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
AU - On behalf of the AGO Study Group
AU - On behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group
AU - Johnatty, Sharon E.
AU - Tyrer, Jonathan P.
AU - Kar, Siddhartha
AU - Beesley, Jonathan
AU - Lu, Yi
AU - Gao, Bo
AU - Fasching, Peter A.
AU - Hein, Alexander
AU - Ekici, Arif B.
AU - Beckmann, Matthias W.
AU - Lambrechts, Diether
AU - Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els
AU - Vergote, Ignace
AU - Lambrechts, Sandrina
AU - Rossing, Mary Anne
AU - Doherty, Jennifer A.
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Modugno, Francesmary
AU - Ness, Roberta B.
AU - Moysich, Kirsten B.
AU - Levine, Douglas A.
AU - Kiemeney, Lambertus A.
AU - Massuger, Leon F.A.G.
AU - Gronwald, Jacek
AU - Lubiński, Jan
AU - Jakubowska, Anna
AU - Cybulski, Cezary
AU - Brinton, Louise
AU - Lissowska, Jolanta
AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas
AU - Song, Honglin
AU - Rhenius, Valerie
AU - Campbell, Ian
AU - Eccles, Diana
AU - Sieh, Weiva
AU - Whittemore, Alice S.
AU - McGuire, Valerie
AU - Rothstein, Joseph H.
AU - Sutphen, Rebecca
AU - Anton-Culver, Hoda
AU - Ziogas, Argyrios
AU - Gayther, Simon A.
AU - Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra
AU - Menon, Usha
AU - Ramus, Susan J.
AU - Pearce, Celeste L.
AU - Pike, Malcolm C.
AU - Winham, Stacey J.
AU - Cunningham, Julie M.
AU - Goode, Ellen L.
N1 - Funding Information: P.A. Fasching reports receiving commercial research support from Amgen and Novartis, and speakers bureau honoraria from Celgene, Genomic Health, GlaxoSmithKline, Nanostring, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. R. Sutphen is employed by and holds ownership interest (including patents) in Informed DNA. A. deFazio reports receiving speakers bureau honoraria from Roche, and is a consultant/advisory board member for AstraZeneca. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors. This study would not have been possible without the contributions of the following: Per Hall (COGS); Douglas F. Easton, Paul Pharoah, Kyriaki Michailidou, Manjeet K. Bolla, Qin Wang (BCAC); Andrew Berchuck (OCAC); Rosalind A. Eeles, Douglas F. Easton, Ali Amin Al Olama, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, and Sara Benlloch (PRACTICAL); Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Antonis Antoniou, Lesley McGuffog, Fergus Couch, and Ken Offit (CIMBA); Joe Dennis, Alison M. Dunning, Andrew Lee, and Ed Dicks; Craig Luccarini and the staff of the Centre forGenetic Epidemiology Laboratory; Javier Benitez, Anna Gonzalez-Neira, and the staff of the CNIO genotyping unit; Jacques Simard and Daniel C. Tessier, Francois Bacot, Daniel Vincent, Sylvie LaBoissière, Frederic Robidoux, and the staff of the McGill University and Geˊnome Queˊbec Innovation Centre; Stig E. Bojesen, Sune F. Nielsen, Borge G. Nordestgaard, and the staff of the Copenhagen DNA laboratory; and Julie M. Cunningham, Sharon A. Windebank, Christopher A. Hilker, Jeffrey Meyer, and the staff of Mayo Clinic Genotyping Core Facility. The authors are grateful to the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith for their generous support for theOvarian Cancer Association Consortium through their donations to theOvarian Cancer Research Fund. They thank Margie Riggan for her tireless dedication to the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium through her excellent project and data management. The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Management Group (D. Bowtell, G. Chenevix-Trench, A. deFazio, D. Gertig, A. Green, and P. Webb) and ACS Investigators (A. Green, P. Parsons, N. Hayward, P. Webb, and D. Whiteman) thank all the clinical and scientific collaborators (see http://www.aocstudy.org/) and the women for their contribution. G. Chenevix-Trench and P.M. Webb are supported by Fellowships from NHMRC. The Belgian study (BEL) would like to thank Gilian Peuteman, Thomas Van Brussel, and Dominiek Smeets for technical assistance. The German Ovarian Cancer Study (GER) thanks Ursula Eilber and Tanja Koehler for competent technical assistance. The International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm study (ICON)7 trial team would like to thank the Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trial Unit (CTU) at the University of London (UCL), the ICON7 Translational Research Sub-group, and the University of Leeds for their work on the coordination of samples and data from the ICON7 trial. The Mayo Clinic Ovarian Cancer Case-Control Study (MAY) thanks C. Hilker, S. Windebank, and J. Vollenweider for iSelect genotyping. The Study of Epidemiology and Risk Factors in Cancer Heredity (SEA) acknowledges Craig Luccarini, Caroline Baynes, and Don Conroy. The Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer (SRO) thanks all members of Scottish Gynaecological Clinical Trails group and SCOTROC1 investigators. The United Kingdom Ovarian Cancer Population Study (UKO) particularly thanks I. Jacobs, M. Widschwendter, E. Wozniak, A. Ryan, J. Ford, and N. Balogun for their contribution to the study. The Westmead Hospital Molecular Biology of Gynaecologic Disease (WMH) thanks the Gynaecological Oncology Biobank at Westmead, a member of the Australasian Biospecimen Network-Oncology group, which is funded by the NationalHealth andMedical Research Council Enabling Grants ID 310670 and ID 628903 and the Cancer Institute NSW. AUS studies (Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and the Australian Cancer Study) were funded by Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17-01-1-0729); National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia; Cancer Councils of New SouthWales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania; Cancer Foundation of Western Australia; and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (199600 and 400281). The grant numbers for AOCS Cancer Council funding are as follows: Multi-State Application Numbers 191, 211, and 182. The Bavarian study (BAV) was supported by ELAN Funds of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg. The Belgian study (BEL) was funded by Nationaal Kankerplan. The Diseases of the Ovary and their Evaluation (DOV) study was funded by NIH R01-CA112523 and R01-CA87538. The German Ovarian Cancer Study (GER) was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany, Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research (01 GB 9401), and the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ). The Hawaii Ovarian Cancer Study (HAW) was supported by R01 CA 058598. The Hormones and Ovarian Cancer Prediction study (HOP) was supported by U.S. National Cancer Institute: K07-CA80668, R01CA095023, P50-CA159981, R01-CA126841; US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command: DAMD17-02-1-0669; and NIH/National Center for Research Resources/General Clinical Research Center grant MO1-RR000056. The Women''s Cancer Program (LAX) was supported by the American Cancer Society Early Detection Professorship (120950-SIOP-06-258-06-COUN) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Grant UL1TR000124. The Mayo Clinic Case-Only Ovarian Cancer Study (MAC) was funded by the NIH (R01-CA122443, P30-CA15083, P50-CA136393). The Mayo Clinic Ovarian Cancer Case-Control Study (MAY) was supported by NIH (R01-CA122443, P30-CA15083, P50-CA136393); Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation. The MALOVA study (MAL) was funded by the National Cancer Institute (grant RO1-CA 61107), the Danish Cancer Society (grant 94-222-52), and the Mermaid I project. The North Carolina Ovarian Cancer Study (NCO) was supported by NIH (R01-CA76016) and the Department of Defense (DAMD17-02-1-0666). The New England-based Case-Control Study of Ovarian Cancer (NEC) was supported by NIH grants R01 CA 054419-10 and P50 CA105009, and Department of Defense CDMRP grant W81XWH-10-1-0280. The New Jersey Ovarian Cancer Study (NJO) was funded by the NCI (NIH-K07 CA095666, R01-CA83918, NIH-K22-CA138563, and P30-CA072720) and the Cancer Institute of New Jersey. The Oregon study (ORE) was funded by the Sherie Hildreth Ovarian Cancer Research Fund and the OHSU Foundation. The Polish Ovarian Cancer Case Control Study (POL) was funded by Intramural Research Program of the NCI. The SEARCH study (SEA) was supported by Cancer Research UK (C490/A8339, C490/A10119, C490/A10124, and C490/A16561) and UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge. The Scottish Randomised Trial in Ovarian Cancer (SRO) was funded by Cancer Research UK (C536/A13086, C536/A6689) and Imperial Experimental Cancer Research Centre (C1312/A15589). The Gynaecological Oncology Biobank at Westmead (WMH) is a member of the Australasian Biospecimen Network-Oncology group, funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Enabling Grants ID 310670 and ID 628903 and the Cancer Institute NSW Grant ID 12/RIG/1-17. The United Kingdom Ovarian cancer Population Study (UKO) was funded by The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation) and supported by the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. The UK Familial Ovarian Cancer Registry (UKR) Cancer Research UK (C490/A6187); UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centers at the University of Cambridge. The Los Angeles County Case-Control Studies of Ovarian Cancer-3 (USC) P01CA17054, P30CA14089, R01CA61132, N01PC67010, R03CA113148, R03CA115195, N01CN025403, and California Cancer Research Program (00-01389V-20170, 2II0200). The Warsaw Ovarian Cancer Study (WOC) Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (4 PO5C 028 14, 2 PO5A 068 27), The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland. Anna deFazio was funded by the University of Sydney Cancer Research Fund and the Cancer Institute NSW through the Sydney West-Translational Cancer Research Centre. Dr. B.Y. Karlan was supported by American Cancer Society Early Detection Professorship (SIOP-06-258-01-COUN) and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Grant UL1TR000124. I. Orlow was supported by NCI CCSG award (P30-CA008748). Funding for the iCOGS infrastructure came from the EuropeanCommunity''s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement no 223175 (HEALTHF2-2009-223175; COGS), Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007, C5047/A10692, C8197/A16565), the National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065, and 1U19 CA148112 - the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defence (W81XWH-10-1-0341), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for the CIHR Team in Familial Risks of Breast Cancer, Komen Foundation for the Cure, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. Publisher Copyright: © 2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with≤4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≥ 1.0 × 10-5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11- 284F21.8, respectively (P ≥ 7.1 × 10-6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≥6 × 10-3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novelEOCtherapies.
AB - Purpose: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome. Experimental Design: We analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with≤4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: Five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≥ 1.0 × 10-5) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11- 284F21.8, respectively (P ≥ 7.1 × 10-6). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≥6 × 10-3). Conclusions: We have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novelEOCtherapies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954178792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954178792&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0632
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0632
M3 - Article
C2 - 26152742
AN - SCOPUS:84954178792
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 21
SP - 5264
EP - 5276
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 23
ER -