Follow-up Testing for Curatively Treated Cancer Survivors: What to Do?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations


The article by Virgo et al1in this issue ofJAMAexamines the question, “What is appropriate follow-up for colorectal cancer patients treated with an intent to cure?” The authors approach this topic by summarizing 11 different strategies and then dealing with financial aspects of proposed follow-up testing recommendations. While such financial considerations are important, there are other important factors to be considered in determining appropriate follow-up practices, these primarily being quantity and quality of life. See also p 1837. There are few data regarding the influence of follow-up strategies on the quality of life of cancer survivors. While some will argue that patients feel reassured when test results are normal and that frequent testing will improve their quality of life, there are many patients whose quality of life is negatively affected for days to weeks in anticipation of upcoming testing procedures, during subsequent procedures performed because of false-positive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1877-1878
Number of pages2
JournalJAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Issue number23
StatePublished - Jun 21 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up Testing for Curatively Treated Cancer Survivors: What to Do?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this