TY - JOUR
T1 - Finite element modeling of embolic coil deployment
T2 - Multifactor characterization of treatment effects on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics
AU - Babiker, M. Haithem
AU - Chong, Brian
AU - Gonzalez, L. Fernando
AU - Cheema, Sachmanik
AU - Frakes, David H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation CAREER Award, the ASU/Mayo Clinic Arizona Seed Grant, the Brain Aneurysm Foundation Research Grant, and the American Heart Association Beginning Grant-in-Aid. The authors would also like to thank Codman Neurovascular (Raynham, MA, USA) and ev3 (Plymouth, MN, USA) for the embolic coils, balloons, and catheters used in developing our FE models.
PY - 2013/11/15
Y1 - 2013/11/15
N2 - Endovascular coiling is the most common treatment for cerebral aneurysms. During the treatment, a sequence of embolic coils with different stiffness, shapes, sizes, and lengths is deployed to fill the aneurysmal sac. Although coil packing density has been clinically correlated with treatment success, many studies have also reported success at low packing densities, as well as recurrence at high packing densities. Such reports indicate that other factors may influence treatment success. In this study, we used a novel finite element approach and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the effects of packing density, coil shape, aneurysmal neck size, and parent vessel flow rate on aneurysmal hemodynamics. The study examines a testbed of 80 unique CFD simulations of post-treatment flows in idealized basilar tip aneurysm models. Simulated coil deployments were validated against in vitro and in vivo deployments. Among the investigated factors, packing density had the largest effect on intra-aneurysmal velocities. However, multifactor analysis of variance showed that coil shape can also have considerable effects, depending on packing density and neck size. Further, linear regression analysis showed an inverse relationship between mean void diameter in the aneurysm and mean intra-aneurysmal velocities, which underscores the importance of coil distribution and thus coil shape. Our study suggests that while packing density plays a key role in determining post-treatment hemodynamics, other factors such as coil shape, aneurysmal geometry, and parent vessel flow may also be very important.
AB - Endovascular coiling is the most common treatment for cerebral aneurysms. During the treatment, a sequence of embolic coils with different stiffness, shapes, sizes, and lengths is deployed to fill the aneurysmal sac. Although coil packing density has been clinically correlated with treatment success, many studies have also reported success at low packing densities, as well as recurrence at high packing densities. Such reports indicate that other factors may influence treatment success. In this study, we used a novel finite element approach and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the effects of packing density, coil shape, aneurysmal neck size, and parent vessel flow rate on aneurysmal hemodynamics. The study examines a testbed of 80 unique CFD simulations of post-treatment flows in idealized basilar tip aneurysm models. Simulated coil deployments were validated against in vitro and in vivo deployments. Among the investigated factors, packing density had the largest effect on intra-aneurysmal velocities. However, multifactor analysis of variance showed that coil shape can also have considerable effects, depending on packing density and neck size. Further, linear regression analysis showed an inverse relationship between mean void diameter in the aneurysm and mean intra-aneurysmal velocities, which underscores the importance of coil distribution and thus coil shape. Our study suggests that while packing density plays a key role in determining post-treatment hemodynamics, other factors such as coil shape, aneurysmal geometry, and parent vessel flow may also be very important.
KW - Cerebral aneurysm
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Embolic coil
KW - Finite element model
KW - Packing density
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887403459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887403459&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.021
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 24119679
AN - SCOPUS:84887403459
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 46
SP - 2809
EP - 2816
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 16
ER -