TY - JOUR
T1 - Exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
T2 - an appraisal through diagnosis, pathophysiology and therapy – A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association and European Association of Preventive Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
AU - Guazzi, Marco
AU - Wilhelm, Matthias
AU - Halle, Martin
AU - Van Craenenbroeck, Emeline
AU - Kemps, Hareld
AU - de Boer, Rudolph A.
AU - Coats, Andrew J.S.
AU - Lund, Lars
AU - Mancini, Donna
AU - Borlaug, Barry
AU - Filippatos, Gerasimos
AU - Pieske, Burkert
N1 - Funding Information:
Open Access Funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Milano within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Conflict of interest: none declared.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance has not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, by neither European nor US groups. The current clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implications of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis of the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echocardiography and/or invasive haemodynamic evaluation. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.
AB - Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance has not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, by neither European nor US groups. The current clinical consensus statement by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implications of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis of the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echocardiography and/or invasive haemodynamic evaluation. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.
KW - Exercise
KW - Functional limitation
KW - Gas exchange analysis
KW - HFpEF
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135189715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135189715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejhf.2601
DO - 10.1002/ejhf.2601
M3 - Article
C2 - 35775383
AN - SCOPUS:85135189715
SN - 1388-9842
VL - 24
SP - 1327
EP - 1345
JO - European Journal of Heart Failure
JF - European Journal of Heart Failure
IS - 8
ER -