TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Extended Infusion Set Performance in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes
T2 - Infusion Set Survival Rate and Glycemic Outcomes from a Pivotal Trial
AU - Brazg, Ron
AU - Garg, Satish K.
AU - Bhargava, Anuj
AU - Thrasher, James R.
AU - Latif, Kashif
AU - Bode, Bruce W.
AU - Bailey, Timothy S.
AU - Horowitz, Barry S.
AU - Cavale, Arvind
AU - Kudva, Yogish C.
AU - Kaiserman, Kevin B.
AU - Grunberger, George
AU - Reed, John Chip
AU - Chattaraj, Sarnath
AU - Zhang, Gina
AU - Shin, John
AU - Chen, Vivian
AU - Lee, Scott W.
AU - Cordero, Toni L.
AU - Rhinehart, Andrew S.
AU - Vigersky, Robert A.
AU - Buckingham, Bruce A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by Medtronic Diabetes.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Ron Brazg, et al.
PY - 2022/8/1
Y1 - 2022/8/1
N2 - Background: Standard insulin infusion sets (IISs) are to be replaced every 2 to 3 days to avoid complications and diabetic ketosis due to set failure. This pivotal trial evaluated the safety and performance of a new extended-wear infusion set (EIS) when used for 7 days by adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: This single-arm, nonrandomized trial enrolled adults (18-80 years of age) with T1D, who used their own MiniMed™ 670G system with insulin lispro or insulin aspart and the EIS for up to 7 days, across 12 consecutive wears. Safety endpoints included incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs), severe hypoglycemia (SevHypo), severe hyperglycemia (SevHyper), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and skin infection. The EIS failure rate due to unexplained hyperglycemia (i.e., suspected occlusion), the overall EIS survival rate, glycemic control outcomes (i.e., A1C, mean sensor glucose and time spent in established glucose ranges), total daily insulin delivered, and satisfaction with the EIS were determined. Results: The intention to treat population (n = 259, 48% men, 45.0 ± 14.1 years) wore a total of 3041 EIS devices. No SADE, UADE, or DKA events was reported. Overall rates of SAEs, SevHypo, SevHyper, and skin infection were 3.8, 2.5, 104.1, and 20.1 events per 100 participant-years. The rate of EIS failure due to unexplained hyperglycemia at the end of day 7 was 0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.51) and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.16-1.00) for insulin lispro and aspart use, respectively. Overall EIS survival rate at the end of day 7 was 77.8% (95% CI: 76.2-79.3), glycemic control did not change, and participants reported greater satisfaction with the EIS compared with standard IISs worn before the study (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that the EIS, when worn for up to 7 days, was safe and rated with high satisfaction, without adversely affecting glycemic control in adults with T1D.
AB - Background: Standard insulin infusion sets (IISs) are to be replaced every 2 to 3 days to avoid complications and diabetic ketosis due to set failure. This pivotal trial evaluated the safety and performance of a new extended-wear infusion set (EIS) when used for 7 days by adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Methods: This single-arm, nonrandomized trial enrolled adults (18-80 years of age) with T1D, who used their own MiniMed™ 670G system with insulin lispro or insulin aspart and the EIS for up to 7 days, across 12 consecutive wears. Safety endpoints included incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), unanticipated adverse device effects (UADEs), severe hypoglycemia (SevHypo), severe hyperglycemia (SevHyper), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and skin infection. The EIS failure rate due to unexplained hyperglycemia (i.e., suspected occlusion), the overall EIS survival rate, glycemic control outcomes (i.e., A1C, mean sensor glucose and time spent in established glucose ranges), total daily insulin delivered, and satisfaction with the EIS were determined. Results: The intention to treat population (n = 259, 48% men, 45.0 ± 14.1 years) wore a total of 3041 EIS devices. No SADE, UADE, or DKA events was reported. Overall rates of SAEs, SevHypo, SevHyper, and skin infection were 3.8, 2.5, 104.1, and 20.1 events per 100 participant-years. The rate of EIS failure due to unexplained hyperglycemia at the end of day 7 was 0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.51) and 0.4% (95% CI: 0.16-1.00) for insulin lispro and aspart use, respectively. Overall EIS survival rate at the end of day 7 was 77.8% (95% CI: 76.2-79.3), glycemic control did not change, and participants reported greater satisfaction with the EIS compared with standard IISs worn before the study (P < 0.001). Conclusions: This investigation demonstrates that the EIS, when worn for up to 7 days, was safe and rated with high satisfaction, without adversely affecting glycemic control in adults with T1D.
KW - Adults
KW - Failure rate
KW - Insulin infusion set
KW - Survival rate
KW - Time in range
KW - Unexplained hyperglycemia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135177941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135177941&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/dia.2021.0540
DO - 10.1089/dia.2021.0540
M3 - Article
C2 - 35263188
AN - SCOPUS:85135177941
SN - 1520-9156
VL - 24
SP - 535
EP - 543
JO - Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics
JF - Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics
IS - 8
ER -