Epigenomics may begin to explain in vitro differential response to hypomethylating agents in MMR-D hypermethylated endometrial cancer

Louis Y. El Khoury, Wan Hsin Lin, James B. Smadbeck, Michael T. Barrett, Dorsay Sadeghian, Alexa F. Mccune, Giannoula Karagouga, John C. Cheville, Faye R. Harris, Lindsey M. Kinsella, Ryan W. Feathers, Janet L. Schafer Klein, Marina R.S. Walther-Antonio, Sarah H. Johnson, Alan R. Penheiter, Giuseppe Cucinella, Gabriella Schivardi, Aditya Bhagwate, Mitesh J. Borad, Aaron S. MansfieldStephen J. Murphy, Andrea Mariani, George Vasmatzis, Panos Z. Anastasiadis, Saravut J. Weroha, Alyssa M. Larish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This work examines differences in chromatin accessibility, methylation, and response to DNA hypomethylating agents between mismatch repair-deficient and non-mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer. Next-generation sequencing of a stage 1B, grade 2 endometrioid endometrial cancer tumor revealed microsatellite instability and a variant of unknown significance in POLE along with global and MLH1 hypermethylation. Inhibition of viability by decitabine in the study and comparison tumors was minimal, as shown by an inhibitory effect of 0 and 17.9, respectively. Conversely, the inhibitory effect of azacitidine on the study tumor was more pronounced, at 72.8 versus 41.2. In vitro, mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer with MLH1 hypermethylation respond better to DNA methyltransferase inhibition by azacytidine (DNA/RNA inhibition), than to decitabine (DNA-only inhibition). Additional large studies are needed to substantiate our findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-292
Number of pages10
JournalEpigenomics
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2023

Keywords

  • DNA methylation
  • azacitidine
  • decitabine
  • endometrial cancer
  • epigenomics
  • mismatch repair

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epigenomics may begin to explain in vitro differential response to hypomethylating agents in MMR-D hypermethylated endometrial cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this