TY - JOUR
T1 - Enhancing nurse and physician collaboration in clinical decision making through high-fidelity interdisciplinary simulation training
AU - Maxson, Pamela M.
AU - Dozois, Eric J.
AU - Holubar, Stefan D.
AU - Wrobleski, Diane M.
AU - Dube, Joyce A.Overman
AU - Klipfel, Janee M.
AU - Arnold, Jacqueline J.
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - Objective: To determine whether interdisciplinary simulation team training can positively affect registered nurse and/or physician perceptions of collaboration in clinical decision making. Participan ts and Methods: Between March 1 and April 21, 2009, a convenience sample of volunteer nurses and physicians was recruited to undergo simulation training consisting of a team response to 3 clinical scenarios. Participants completed the Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD) survey before training and at 2 weeks and 2 months after training. Differences in CSACD summary scores between the time points were assessed with paired t tests. Results: Twenty-eight health care professionals (19 nurses, 9 physicians) underwent simulation training. Nurses were of similar age to physicians (27.3 vs 34.5 years; p=.82), were more likely to be women (95.0% vs 12.5%; p<.001), and were less likely to have undergone prior simulation training (0% vs 37.5%; p=.02). The pretest showed that physicians were more likely to perceive that open communication exists between nurses and physicians (p=.04) and that both medical and nursing concerns influence the decision-making process (p=.02). Pretest CSACD analysis revealed that most participants were dissatisfied with the decisionmaking process. The CSACD summary score showed significant improvement from baseline to 2 weeks (4.2 to 5.1; p<.002), a trend that persisted at 2 months (p<.002). Conclusion: Team training using high-fidelity simulation scenarios promoted collaboration between nurses and physicians and enhanced the patient care decision-making process.
AB - Objective: To determine whether interdisciplinary simulation team training can positively affect registered nurse and/or physician perceptions of collaboration in clinical decision making. Participan ts and Methods: Between March 1 and April 21, 2009, a convenience sample of volunteer nurses and physicians was recruited to undergo simulation training consisting of a team response to 3 clinical scenarios. Participants completed the Collaboration and Satisfaction About Care Decisions (CSACD) survey before training and at 2 weeks and 2 months after training. Differences in CSACD summary scores between the time points were assessed with paired t tests. Results: Twenty-eight health care professionals (19 nurses, 9 physicians) underwent simulation training. Nurses were of similar age to physicians (27.3 vs 34.5 years; p=.82), were more likely to be women (95.0% vs 12.5%; p<.001), and were less likely to have undergone prior simulation training (0% vs 37.5%; p=.02). The pretest showed that physicians were more likely to perceive that open communication exists between nurses and physicians (p=.04) and that both medical and nursing concerns influence the decision-making process (p=.02). Pretest CSACD analysis revealed that most participants were dissatisfied with the decisionmaking process. The CSACD summary score showed significant improvement from baseline to 2 weeks (4.2 to 5.1; p<.002), a trend that persisted at 2 months (p<.002). Conclusion: Team training using high-fidelity simulation scenarios promoted collaboration between nurses and physicians and enhanced the patient care decision-making process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650991816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650991816&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0282
DO - 10.4065/mcp.2010.0282
M3 - Article
C2 - 21193653
AN - SCOPUS:78650991816
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 86
SP - 31
EP - 36
JO - Mayo Clinic proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic proceedings
IS - 1
ER -