TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Different Models of Dialysis Care on Patient-Important Outcomes
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU - Ramar, Priya
AU - Ahmed, Ahmed T.
AU - Wang, Zhen
AU - Chawla, Sagar S.
AU - Suarez, Maria Lourdes Gonzalez
AU - Hickson, La Tonya J.
AU - Farrell, Ann
AU - Williams, Amy W.
AU - Shah, Nilay D.
AU - Murad, M. Hassan
AU - Thorsteinsdottir, Bjorg
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Ongoing payment reform in dialysis necessitates better patient outcomes and lower costs. Suggested improvements to processes of care for maintenance dialysis patients are abundant; however, their impact on patient-important outcomes is unclear. This systematic review included comparative randomized controlled trials or observational studies with no restriction on language, published from 2000 to 2014, involving at least 5 adult dialysis patients who received a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The effect size was pooled and stratified by intervention strategy (multidisciplinary care [MDC], home dialysis, alternate dialysis settings, and electronic health record implementation). Heterogeneity (I2) was used to assess the variability in study effects related to study differences rather than chance. Of the 1988 articles screened, 25 international studies with 74,833 maintenance dialysis patients were included. Interventions with MDC or home dialysis were associated with a lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 0.84, I2 = 41.6%; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.81, I2 = 89.0%; respectively) and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.51, 0.91, I2 = NA; IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64, 1.20, I2 = 79.6%; respectively). Alternate dialysis settings also were associated with a reduction in hospitalizations (IRR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25, 0.69, I2 = 0.0%). This systematic review underscores the importance of multidisciplinary care, and also the value of telemedicine as a means to increase access to providers and enhance outcomes for those dialyzing at home or in alternate settings, including those with limited access to nephrology expertise because of travel distance.
AB - Ongoing payment reform in dialysis necessitates better patient outcomes and lower costs. Suggested improvements to processes of care for maintenance dialysis patients are abundant; however, their impact on patient-important outcomes is unclear. This systematic review included comparative randomized controlled trials or observational studies with no restriction on language, published from 2000 to 2014, involving at least 5 adult dialysis patients who received a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. The effect size was pooled and stratified by intervention strategy (multidisciplinary care [MDC], home dialysis, alternate dialysis settings, and electronic health record implementation). Heterogeneity (I2) was used to assess the variability in study effects related to study differences rather than chance. Of the 1988 articles screened, 25 international studies with 74,833 maintenance dialysis patients were included. Interventions with MDC or home dialysis were associated with a lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61, 0.84, I2 = 41.6%; HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.81, I2 = 89.0%; respectively) and hospitalizations (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.68, 95% CI 0.51, 0.91, I2 = NA; IRR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.64, 1.20, I2 = 79.6%; respectively). Alternate dialysis settings also were associated with a reduction in hospitalizations (IRR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25, 0.69, I2 = 0.0%). This systematic review underscores the importance of multidisciplinary care, and also the value of telemedicine as a means to increase access to providers and enhance outcomes for those dialyzing at home or in alternate settings, including those with limited access to nephrology expertise because of travel distance.
KW - end-stage renal disease
KW - home dialysis
KW - multidisciplinary care
KW - systematic review
KW - telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037035807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037035807&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/pop.2016.0157
DO - 10.1089/pop.2016.0157
M3 - Article
C2 - 28332943
AN - SCOPUS:85037035807
SN - 1942-7891
VL - 20
SP - 495
EP - 505
JO - Population health management
JF - Population health management
IS - 6
ER -