TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical recognition and management of patients with prediabetes
AU - Njeru, Jane W.
AU - Castro, M. Regina
AU - Carta, Karina Gonzalez
AU - Simon, Gyorgy
AU - Caraballo, Pedro J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NIH grant LM11972, NSF grants IIS-1602198, IIS-1602394 and NIH grant R01AG034676. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NIH and NSF.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 AACE.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - Objective: Early identification and management of prediabetes is critical to prevent progression to diabetes. We aimed to assess whether prediabetes is appropriately recognized and managed among patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Methods: We carried out an observational study of Olmsted County residents evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1999-2017. We randomly selected 108 subjects with biochemical criteria of IFG and 105 normoglycemic subjects. We reviewed their health records at baseline (1999-2004) and during follow up (2005-2017) collecting demographic and clinical data including vitals, diagnoses, laboratory, and medications associated with cardiovascular comorbidities. The main outcome was documentation of any recognition of prediabetes and management recommendations (lifestyle changes and/or medications). Results: At baseline (1999-2004), 26.85% (29/108) of subjects with IFG were recognized as having prediabetes, and of these 75.86% (22/29) received management recommendations with 6.9% (2/29) getting metformin. During follow-up (2005-2017), 26.67% (28/105) of initial cohort of normoglycemic subjects developed incident IFG and of these, 85.71% (24/28) were recognized as having prediabetes, and 58.33% (14/24) received management recommendations. During the entire study period, 62.50% (85/136) were recognized as having prediabetes of which 75.29% (64/85) had documented management recommendations. High body mass index (BMI) (≥35) was associated with increased recognition (odds ratio [OR] 3.66; confidence interval [CI] 1.065, 12.500; P = .0395), and normal BMI (<25) was associated with a lack of recognition (OR 0.146; CI 0.189, 0.966; P = .0413). Conclusion: Despite evidence supporting the efficacy of lifestyle changes and medications in managing prediabetes, this condition is not fully recognized in routine clinical practice. Increased awareness of diagnostic criteria and appropriate management are essential to enhance diabetes prevention.
AB - Objective: Early identification and management of prediabetes is critical to prevent progression to diabetes. We aimed to assess whether prediabetes is appropriately recognized and managed among patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Methods: We carried out an observational study of Olmsted County residents evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1999-2017. We randomly selected 108 subjects with biochemical criteria of IFG and 105 normoglycemic subjects. We reviewed their health records at baseline (1999-2004) and during follow up (2005-2017) collecting demographic and clinical data including vitals, diagnoses, laboratory, and medications associated with cardiovascular comorbidities. The main outcome was documentation of any recognition of prediabetes and management recommendations (lifestyle changes and/or medications). Results: At baseline (1999-2004), 26.85% (29/108) of subjects with IFG were recognized as having prediabetes, and of these 75.86% (22/29) received management recommendations with 6.9% (2/29) getting metformin. During follow-up (2005-2017), 26.67% (28/105) of initial cohort of normoglycemic subjects developed incident IFG and of these, 85.71% (24/28) were recognized as having prediabetes, and 58.33% (14/24) received management recommendations. During the entire study period, 62.50% (85/136) were recognized as having prediabetes of which 75.29% (64/85) had documented management recommendations. High body mass index (BMI) (≥35) was associated with increased recognition (odds ratio [OR] 3.66; confidence interval [CI] 1.065, 12.500; P = .0395), and normal BMI (<25) was associated with a lack of recognition (OR 0.146; CI 0.189, 0.966; P = .0413). Conclusion: Despite evidence supporting the efficacy of lifestyle changes and medications in managing prediabetes, this condition is not fully recognized in routine clinical practice. Increased awareness of diagnostic criteria and appropriate management are essential to enhance diabetes prevention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068049774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068049774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4158/EP-2018-0485
DO - 10.4158/EP-2018-0485
M3 - Article
C2 - 30865535
AN - SCOPUS:85068049774
SN - 1530-891X
VL - 25
SP - 545
EP - 553
JO - Endocrine Practice
JF - Endocrine Practice
IS - 6
ER -