TY - JOUR
T1 - Causality analysis of neural connectivity
T2 - Critical examination of existing methods and advances of new methods
AU - Hu, Sanqing
AU - Dai, Guojun
AU - Worrell, Gregory A.
AU - Dai, Qionghai
AU - Liang, Hualou
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received November 30, 2010; revised February 24, 2011; accepted February 26, 2011. Date of publication April 19, 2011; date of current version June 2, 2011. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61070127, and the International Cooperation Project of Zhejiang Province, China, under Grant 2009C14013, Grant NIH R01 MH072034, Grant NIH R01 NS054314, and Grant NIH R01 NS063039.
PY - 2011/6
Y1 - 2011/6
N2 - Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular measures to reveal causality influence of time series and has been widely applied in economics and neuroscience. Especially, its counterpart in frequency domain, spectral GC, as well as other Granger-like causality measures have recently been applied to study causal interactions between brain areas in different frequency ranges during cognitive and perceptual tasks. In this paper, we show that: 1) GC in time domain cannot correctly determine how strongly one time series influences the other when there is directional causality between two time series, and 2) spectral GC and other Granger-like causality measures have inherent shortcomings and/or limitations because of the use of the transfer function (or its inverse matrix) and partial information of the linear regression model. On the other hand, we propose two novel causality measures (in time and frequency domains) for the linear regression model, called new causality and new spectral causality, respectively, which are more reasonable and understandable than GC or Granger-like measures. Especially, from one simple example, we point out that, in time domain, both new causality and GC adopt the concept of proportion, but they are defined on two different equations where one equation (for GC) is only part of the other (for new causality), thus the new causality is a natural extension of GC and has a sound conceptual/theoretical basis, and GC is not the desired causal influence at all. By several examples, we confirm that new causality measures have distinct advantages over GC or Granger-like measures. Finally, we conduct event-related potential causality analysis for a subject with intracranial depth electrodes undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery, and show that, in the frequency domain, all measures reveal significant directional event-related causality, but the result from new spectral causality is consistent with event-related timefrequency power spectrum activity. The spectral GC as well as other Granger-like measures are shown to generate misleading results. The proposed new causality measures may have wide potential applications in economics and neuroscience.
AB - Granger causality (GC) is one of the most popular measures to reveal causality influence of time series and has been widely applied in economics and neuroscience. Especially, its counterpart in frequency domain, spectral GC, as well as other Granger-like causality measures have recently been applied to study causal interactions between brain areas in different frequency ranges during cognitive and perceptual tasks. In this paper, we show that: 1) GC in time domain cannot correctly determine how strongly one time series influences the other when there is directional causality between two time series, and 2) spectral GC and other Granger-like causality measures have inherent shortcomings and/or limitations because of the use of the transfer function (or its inverse matrix) and partial information of the linear regression model. On the other hand, we propose two novel causality measures (in time and frequency domains) for the linear regression model, called new causality and new spectral causality, respectively, which are more reasonable and understandable than GC or Granger-like measures. Especially, from one simple example, we point out that, in time domain, both new causality and GC adopt the concept of proportion, but they are defined on two different equations where one equation (for GC) is only part of the other (for new causality), thus the new causality is a natural extension of GC and has a sound conceptual/theoretical basis, and GC is not the desired causal influence at all. By several examples, we confirm that new causality measures have distinct advantages over GC or Granger-like measures. Finally, we conduct event-related potential causality analysis for a subject with intracranial depth electrodes undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery, and show that, in the frequency domain, all measures reveal significant directional event-related causality, but the result from new spectral causality is consistent with event-related timefrequency power spectrum activity. The spectral GC as well as other Granger-like measures are shown to generate misleading results. The proposed new causality measures may have wide potential applications in economics and neuroscience.
KW - Event-related potential
KW - Granger or Granger-like causality
KW - linear regression model
KW - new causality
KW - power spectrum
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957978757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957978757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TNN.2011.2123917
DO - 10.1109/TNN.2011.2123917
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21511564
AN - SCOPUS:79957978757
SN - 1045-9227
VL - 22
SP - 829
EP - 844
JO - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
JF - IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
IS - 6
M1 - 5751700
ER -