TY - JOUR
T1 - Automating clinical score calculation within the electronic health record
T2 - A Feasibility Assessment
AU - Aakre, Christopher
AU - Dziadzko, Mikhail
AU - Keegan, Mark T.
AU - Herasevich, Vitaly
N1 - Funding Information:
This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© Schattauer 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objectives: Evidence-based clinical scores are used frequently in clinical practice, but data collection and data entry can be time consuming and hinder their use. We investigated the programmability of 168 common clinical calculators for automation within electronic health records. Methods: We manually reviewed and categorized variables from 168 clinical calculators as being extractable from structured data, unstructured data, or both. Advanced data retrieval methods from unstructured data sources were tabulated for diagnoses, non-laboratory test results, clinical history, and examination findings. Results: We identified 534 unique variables, of which 203/534 (37.8%) were extractable from structured data and 269/534 (50.4.7%) were potentially extractable using advanced techniques. Nearly half (265/534, 49.6%) of all variables were not retrievable. Only 26/168 (15.5%) of scores were completely programmable using only structured data and 43/168 (25.6%) could potentially be programmable using widely available advanced information retrieval techniques. Scores relying on clinical examination findings or clinical judgments were most often not completely programmable. Conclusion: Complete automation is not possible for most clinical scores because of the high prevalence of clinical examination findings or clinical judgments – partial automation is the most that can be achieved. The effect of fully or partially automated score calculation on clinical efficiency and clinical guideline adherence requires further study.
AB - Objectives: Evidence-based clinical scores are used frequently in clinical practice, but data collection and data entry can be time consuming and hinder their use. We investigated the programmability of 168 common clinical calculators for automation within electronic health records. Methods: We manually reviewed and categorized variables from 168 clinical calculators as being extractable from structured data, unstructured data, or both. Advanced data retrieval methods from unstructured data sources were tabulated for diagnoses, non-laboratory test results, clinical history, and examination findings. Results: We identified 534 unique variables, of which 203/534 (37.8%) were extractable from structured data and 269/534 (50.4.7%) were potentially extractable using advanced techniques. Nearly half (265/534, 49.6%) of all variables were not retrievable. Only 26/168 (15.5%) of scores were completely programmable using only structured data and 43/168 (25.6%) could potentially be programmable using widely available advanced information retrieval techniques. Scores relying on clinical examination findings or clinical judgments were most often not completely programmable. Conclusion: Complete automation is not possible for most clinical scores because of the high prevalence of clinical examination findings or clinical judgments – partial automation is the most that can be achieved. The effect of fully or partially automated score calculation on clinical efficiency and clinical guideline adherence requires further study.
KW - Automation
KW - Clinical practice guideline
KW - Clinical score
KW - Decision support algorithm
KW - Knowledge translation
KW - Workflow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018884159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018884159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0149
DO - 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-RA-0149
M3 - Article
C2 - 28401245
AN - SCOPUS:85018884159
SN - 1869-0327
VL - 8
SP - 369
EP - 380
JO - Applied clinical informatics
JF - Applied clinical informatics
IS - 2
ER -