Assessing Biological Age: The Potential of ECG Evaluation Using Artificial Intelligence: JACC Family Series

Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, Suraj Kapa, Paul A. Friedman, Nathan K. LeBrasseur, Eric Klavetter, Kathryn E. Mangold, Zachi I. Attia

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Biological age may be a more valuable predictor of morbidity and mortality than a person's chronological age. Mathematical models have been used for decades to predict biological age, but recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to new capabilities in age estimation. Using deep learning methods to train AI models on hundreds of thousands of electrocardiograms (ECGs) to predict age results in a good, but imperfect, age prediction. The error predicting age using ECG, or the difference between AI-ECG–derived age and chronological age (delta age), may be a surrogate measurement of biological age, as the delta age relates to survival, even after adjusting for chronological age and other covariates associated with total and cardiovascular mortality. The relative affordability, noninvasiveness, and ubiquity of ECGs, combined with ease of access and potential to be integrated with smartphone or wearable technology, presents a potential paradigm shift in assessment of biological age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)775-789
Number of pages15
JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • AI
  • artificial intelligence
  • biological age
  • delta age
  • ECG
  • mortality
  • risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Biological Age: The Potential of ECG Evaluation Using Artificial Intelligence: JACC Family Series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this