TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Gynaecologic Disorders
T2 - A Scoping Review
AU - Willison, Nadia
AU - Behnia-Willison, Fariba
AU - Aryan, Pouria
AU - Padhani, Zahra Ali
AU - Mirzaei Damabi, Negin
AU - Nguyen, Tran
AU - Yi, Johnny
AU - Dutta, Rituparna
AU - Abbott, Derek
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is a non-invasive, autologous treatment with regenerative potential in gynaecology beyond fertility applications. This review evaluates PRP in non-fertility-related gynaecological conditions affecting women’s quality of life (QoL). Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE for studies on PRP in conditions such as vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS), vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), sexual dysfunction (SD), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Of 3660 records screened, 43 studies (randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental, cohort, and case series) were included. Results: PRP improved symptoms and QoL in several conditions, particularly VLS and SD, and was generally well tolerated with minor adverse effects (e.g., injection-site pain, transient discomfort). Evidence for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) was inconclusive. Considerable heterogeneity in preparation protocols and outcome measures limited cross-study comparison. Conclusions: PRP shows promise as a minimally invasive therapy for certain gynaecological conditions. Standardisation of preparation and administration, along with large-scale RCTs, is needed to determine long-term efficacy and safety.
AB - Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy is a non-invasive, autologous treatment with regenerative potential in gynaecology beyond fertility applications. This review evaluates PRP in non-fertility-related gynaecological conditions affecting women’s quality of life (QoL). Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we searched Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE for studies on PRP in conditions such as vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS), vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), sexual dysfunction (SD), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS). Of 3660 records screened, 43 studies (randomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental, cohort, and case series) were included. Results: PRP improved symptoms and QoL in several conditions, particularly VLS and SD, and was generally well tolerated with minor adverse effects (e.g., injection-site pain, transient discomfort). Evidence for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) was inconclusive. Considerable heterogeneity in preparation protocols and outcome measures limited cross-study comparison. Conclusions: PRP shows promise as a minimally invasive therapy for certain gynaecological conditions. Standardisation of preparation and administration, along with large-scale RCTs, is needed to determine long-term efficacy and safety.
KW - gynaecological conditions
KW - pelvic floor
KW - platelet rich plasma
KW - regenerative medicine
KW - urinary incontinence
KW - vulvar lichen sclerosus
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014446688
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014446688#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.3390/jcm14165832
DO - 10.3390/jcm14165832
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:105014446688
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 14
JO - Journal of Clinical Medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical Medicine
IS - 16
M1 - 5832
ER -