An exploratory analysis of real-world end points for assessing outcomes among immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer

Mark Stewart, Andrew D. Norden, Nancy Dreyer, Henry Joe Henk, Amy P. Abernethy, Elizabeth Chrischilles, Lawrence Kushi, Aaron S. Mansfield, Sean Khozin, Elad Sharon, Srikesh Arunajadai, Ryan Carnahan, Jennifer B. Christian, Rebecca A. Miksad, Lori C. Sakoda, Aracelis Z. Torres, Emily Valice, Jeff Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations


PURPOSE This pilot study examined the ability to operationalize the collection of real-world data to explore the potential use of real-world end points extracted from data from diverse health care data organizations and to assess how these relate to similar end points in clinical trials for immunotherapy-treated advanced non–small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Researchers from six organizations followed a common protocol using data from administrative claims and electronic health records to assess real-world end points, including overall survival (rwOS), time to next treatment, time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD), time to progression, and progression-free survival, among patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer treated with programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in real-world settings. Data sets included from 269 to 6,924 patients who were treated between January 2011 and October 2017. Results from contributors were anonymized. RESULTS Correlations between real-world intermediate end points (rwTTD and time to next treatment) and rwOS were moderate to high (range, 0.6 to 0.9). rwTTD was the most consistent end points as treatment detail was available in all data sets. rwOS at 1 year post–programmed death-ligand 1 initiation ranged from 40% to 57%. In addition, rwOS as assessed via electronic health records and claims data fell within the range of median OS values observed in relevant clinical trials. Data sources had been used extensively for research with ongoing data curation to assure accuracy and practical completeness before the initiation of this research. CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate that real-world end points are generally consistent with each other and with outcomes observed in randomized clinical trials, which substantiates the potential validity of real-world data to support regulatory and payer decision making. Differences observed likely reflect true differences between real-world and protocol-driven practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalJCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
StatePublished - 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'An exploratory analysis of real-world end points for assessing outcomes among immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this