All-Inside PCL Reconstruction

Erik Therrien, Ayoosh Pareek, Bryant M. Song, Ryan R. Wilbur, Michael J. Stuart, Bruce A. Levy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Many different techniques with multiple graft types have been described for the reconstruction of the injured posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); autograft versus allograft, single- versus double-bundle, open inlay versus arthroscopic inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial, and recently described the arthroscopic all-inside socket technique. Reported clinical outcomes have demonstrated no significant difference in any of these PCL reconstruction techniques, likely because of the heterogeneity in injury characteristics and patient population. The ideal surgical technique should be safe, simple, and reproducible while allowing treatment of concomitant knee injuries resulting and return to function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number20nov0020ssa
Pages (from-to)472-477
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Knee Surgery
Issue number5
StatePublished - Apr 1 2021


  • PCL
  • PCL reconstruction
  • all-inside PCL reconstruction
  • posterior cruciate ligament

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'All-Inside PCL Reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this