TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing Care Team Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems for Cancer Symptom Management
T2 - Findings From a Hybrid Type II, Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Trial
AU - Austin, Jessica D.
AU - Finney Rutten, Lila J.
AU - Fischer, Kristin
AU - Ridgeway, Jennifer
AU - Minteer, Sarah
AU - Griffin, Joan M.
AU - Pachman, Deirdre R.
AU - Ruddy, Kathryn J.
AU - Cheville, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - PURPOSEThe enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) trial is a cohort cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial that leverages EHR systems to facilitate a collaborative care model (CCM) approach with the goal of improving cancer symptom management. Understanding factors that influence care team adoption of EHR systems remains a critical understudied area of research. This study examines how oncology care teams' perceptions regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of E2C2 EHR systems preimplementation were associated with adoption 3 months after implementation and characterizes differences in adoption by individual- and system-level factors.METHODSCare team members completed an electronic survey before and 3 months after implementation of E2C2 for their respective sequence. Adoption was defined as frequency of use to statements aligned with care team-directed EHR systems designed to facilitate CCM approaches. Chi-square tests assessed differences in adoption while logistic regression models estimated associations between baseline mean scores of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness on care team adoption at 3 months.RESULTSResults from 94 care team members (37.2% oncologists, 72.6% female, 55.3% in their role for 6+ years) found that adoption rates ranged from 48.9% to 71.7%, with significant differences observed by location (community-based health care systems v tertiary medical center) and professional role. Adjusting for professional role, care team members reporting higher levels of perceived acceptability and appropriateness at baseline had greater odds of adopting EHR systems at 3 months.CONCLUSIONEHR systems perceived as acceptable and appropriate are more likely to be adopted by oncology care teams in our sample. Future implementation efforts should consider tailored strategies to facilitate adoption of EHR systems designed to promote CCM-based approaches to improve cancer symptom management.
AB - PURPOSEThe enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) trial is a cohort cluster-randomized, stepped-wedge, hybrid type II trial that leverages EHR systems to facilitate a collaborative care model (CCM) approach with the goal of improving cancer symptom management. Understanding factors that influence care team adoption of EHR systems remains a critical understudied area of research. This study examines how oncology care teams' perceptions regarding the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of E2C2 EHR systems preimplementation were associated with adoption 3 months after implementation and characterizes differences in adoption by individual- and system-level factors.METHODSCare team members completed an electronic survey before and 3 months after implementation of E2C2 for their respective sequence. Adoption was defined as frequency of use to statements aligned with care team-directed EHR systems designed to facilitate CCM approaches. Chi-square tests assessed differences in adoption while logistic regression models estimated associations between baseline mean scores of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness on care team adoption at 3 months.RESULTSResults from 94 care team members (37.2% oncologists, 72.6% female, 55.3% in their role for 6+ years) found that adoption rates ranged from 48.9% to 71.7%, with significant differences observed by location (community-based health care systems v tertiary medical center) and professional role. Adjusting for professional role, care team members reporting higher levels of perceived acceptability and appropriateness at baseline had greater odds of adopting EHR systems at 3 months.CONCLUSIONEHR systems perceived as acceptable and appropriate are more likely to be adopted by oncology care teams in our sample. Future implementation efforts should consider tailored strategies to facilitate adoption of EHR systems designed to promote CCM-based approaches to improve cancer symptom management.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85201009313
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201009313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/OP.24.00280
DO - 10.1200/OP.24.00280
M3 - Article
C2 - 39106420
AN - SCOPUS:85201009313
SN - 2688-1527
VL - 21
SP - 209
EP - 217
JO - JCO Oncology Practice
JF - JCO Oncology Practice
IS - 2
ER -