TY - JOUR
T1 - Adjustment of open-loop settings to improve closed-loop results in type 1 diabetes
T2 - A multicenter randomized trial
AU - Dassau, Eyal
AU - Brown, Sue A.
AU - Basu, Ananda
AU - Pinsker, Jordan E.
AU - Kudva, Yogish C.
AU - Gondhalekar, Ravi
AU - Patek, Steve
AU - Lv, Dayu
AU - Schiavon, Michele
AU - Lee, Joon Bok
AU - Dalla Man, Chiara
AU - Hinshaw, Ling
AU - Castorino, Kristin
AU - Mallad, Ashwini
AU - Dadlani, Vikash
AU - McCrady-Spitzer, Shelly K.
AU - McElwee-Malloy, Molly
AU - Wakeman, Christian A.
AU - Bevier, Wendy C.
AU - Bradley, Paige K.
AU - Kovatchev, Boris
AU - Cobelli, Claudio
AU - Zisser, Howard C.
AU - Doyle, Francis J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the Endocrine Society.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - Context: Closed-loop control (CLC) relies on an individual's open-loop insulin pump settings to initialize the system. Optimizing open-loop settings before using CLC usually requires significant time and effort. Objective: The objective was to investigate the effects of a one-time algorithmic adjustment of basal rate and insulin to carbohydrate ratio open-loop settings on the performance of CLC. Design: This study reports a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Patients: Thirty-seven adults with type 1 diabetes were enrolled at three clinical sites. Interventions: Each subject's insulin pump settings were subject to a one-time algorithmic adjustment based on 1 week of open-loop (i.e., home care) data collection. Subjects then underwent two 27-hour periods of CLC in random order with either unchanged (control) or algorithmic adjusted basal rate and carbohydrate ratio settings (adjusted) used to initialize the zone-model predictive control artificial pancreascontroller. Subject'sfollowedtheirusualmeal-planandhadanunannouncedexercise session. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time in the glucose range was 80-140 mg/dL, compared between both arms. Results: Thirty-two subjects completed the protocol. Median time in CLC was 25.3 hours. The median time in the 80-140 mg/dl rangewassimilar in both groups (39.7% control,44.2%adjusted). Subjects in both arms of CLC showed minimal time spent less than 70 mg/dl (median 1.34% and 1.37%, respectively). There were no significant differences more than 140 mg/dL. Conclusions: A one-time algorithmic adjustment of open-loop settings did not alter glucose control in a relatively short duration outpatient closed-loop study. The CLC system proved very robust and adaptable, with minimal (∼2%) time spent in the hypoglycemic range in either arm.
AB - Context: Closed-loop control (CLC) relies on an individual's open-loop insulin pump settings to initialize the system. Optimizing open-loop settings before using CLC usually requires significant time and effort. Objective: The objective was to investigate the effects of a one-time algorithmic adjustment of basal rate and insulin to carbohydrate ratio open-loop settings on the performance of CLC. Design: This study reports a multicenter, outpatient, randomized, crossover clinical trial. Patients: Thirty-seven adults with type 1 diabetes were enrolled at three clinical sites. Interventions: Each subject's insulin pump settings were subject to a one-time algorithmic adjustment based on 1 week of open-loop (i.e., home care) data collection. Subjects then underwent two 27-hour periods of CLC in random order with either unchanged (control) or algorithmic adjusted basal rate and carbohydrate ratio settings (adjusted) used to initialize the zone-model predictive control artificial pancreascontroller. Subject'sfollowedtheirusualmeal-planandhadanunannouncedexercise session. Main Outcomes and Measures: Time in the glucose range was 80-140 mg/dL, compared between both arms. Results: Thirty-two subjects completed the protocol. Median time in CLC was 25.3 hours. The median time in the 80-140 mg/dl rangewassimilar in both groups (39.7% control,44.2%adjusted). Subjects in both arms of CLC showed minimal time spent less than 70 mg/dl (median 1.34% and 1.37%, respectively). There were no significant differences more than 140 mg/dL. Conclusions: A one-time algorithmic adjustment of open-loop settings did not alter glucose control in a relatively short duration outpatient closed-loop study. The CLC system proved very robust and adaptable, with minimal (∼2%) time spent in the hypoglycemic range in either arm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943792254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943792254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1210/jc.2015-2081
DO - 10.1210/jc.2015-2081
M3 - Article
C2 - 26204135
AN - SCOPUS:84943792254
SN - 0021-972X
VL - 100
SP - 3878
EP - 3886
JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
IS - 10
ER -