TY - JOUR
T1 - A real-world study of combined modality therapy for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma
T2 - too little treatment impacts outcome
AU - Chohan, Karan L.
AU - Young, Jason R.
AU - Lester, Scott
AU - Moustafa, Muhamad Alhaj
AU - Rosenthal, Allison
AU - Tun, Han W.
AU - Hoppe, Bradford S.
AU - Johnston, Patrick B.
AU - Micallef, Ivana N.
AU - Habermann, Thomas M.
AU - Ansell, Stephen M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Sheila A. Rushton and Matthew J. Maurer for their contributions to this study. This study was supported by the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma SPORE CA97274-19.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.
PY - 2022/7/26
Y1 - 2022/7/26
N2 - Multiple clinical trials have assessed de-escalation strategies from combined modality therapy (CMT) to chemotherapy-alone for the treatment of early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), confirming similar outcomes. The application of these data to the real-world is limited, however. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study comparing CMT vs chemotherapy-alone in patients with early-stage cHL (stage IA-IIB) treated between January 2010 and December 2020. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans after chemotherapy cycle 2 (PET2) were independently reviewed by a nuclear radiologist (Deauville score $4, positive; #3, negative). Patient outcomes were compared by using an intention-to-treat analysis. Among 125 patients (CMT, n 5 63; chemotherapy-alone, n 5 62) with a median follow-up of 59.8 months (95% CI, 48.6-71.0), no differences in overall survival were observed (5-year overall survival, CMT 98.0% vs chemotherapy-alone 95.1%; log-rank test, P 5 .38). However, there was reduced progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy-alone among all patients (2-year PFS, CMT 95.1% vs chemotherapy-alone 75.3%; log-rank test, P 5 .005) and in those with bulky (n 5 43; log-rank test, P, .001), unfavorable (n 5 81; log-rank test, P 5 .002), or PET2-positive (n 5 15; log-rank test, P 5 .02) disease. No significant differences in PFS were seen for patients with non-bulky (log-rank test, P 5 .35), favorable (log-rank test, P 5 .62), or PET2-negative (log-rank test, P 5 .19) disease. Based on our real-world experience, CMT seems beneficial for patients with early-stage cHL, especially those with PET2-positive and unfavorable disease. Chemotherapy-alone regimens can lead to comparable outcomes for patients with favorable, non-bulky, or PET2-negative disease. We conclude that although results seen in clinical trials are replicated in certain patient subgroups, other subgroups not fitting trial criteria do poorly when radiotherapy is excluded.
AB - Multiple clinical trials have assessed de-escalation strategies from combined modality therapy (CMT) to chemotherapy-alone for the treatment of early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), confirming similar outcomes. The application of these data to the real-world is limited, however. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study comparing CMT vs chemotherapy-alone in patients with early-stage cHL (stage IA-IIB) treated between January 2010 and December 2020. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans after chemotherapy cycle 2 (PET2) were independently reviewed by a nuclear radiologist (Deauville score $4, positive; #3, negative). Patient outcomes were compared by using an intention-to-treat analysis. Among 125 patients (CMT, n 5 63; chemotherapy-alone, n 5 62) with a median follow-up of 59.8 months (95% CI, 48.6-71.0), no differences in overall survival were observed (5-year overall survival, CMT 98.0% vs chemotherapy-alone 95.1%; log-rank test, P 5 .38). However, there was reduced progression-free survival (PFS) with chemotherapy-alone among all patients (2-year PFS, CMT 95.1% vs chemotherapy-alone 75.3%; log-rank test, P 5 .005) and in those with bulky (n 5 43; log-rank test, P, .001), unfavorable (n 5 81; log-rank test, P 5 .002), or PET2-positive (n 5 15; log-rank test, P 5 .02) disease. No significant differences in PFS were seen for patients with non-bulky (log-rank test, P 5 .35), favorable (log-rank test, P 5 .62), or PET2-negative (log-rank test, P 5 .19) disease. Based on our real-world experience, CMT seems beneficial for patients with early-stage cHL, especially those with PET2-positive and unfavorable disease. Chemotherapy-alone regimens can lead to comparable outcomes for patients with favorable, non-bulky, or PET2-negative disease. We conclude that although results seen in clinical trials are replicated in certain patient subgroups, other subgroups not fitting trial criteria do poorly when radiotherapy is excluded.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134847250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134847250&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007363
DO - 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007363
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35617689
AN - SCOPUS:85134847250
SN - 2473-9529
VL - 6
SP - 4241
EP - 4250
JO - Blood Advances
JF - Blood Advances
IS - 14
ER -