TY - JOUR
T1 - A Phase i clinical trial of the combination of imatinib and paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors refractory to standard therapy
AU - Pishvaian, Michael J.
AU - Slack, Rebecca
AU - Koh, Eunice Y.
AU - Beumer, Jan H.
AU - Hartley, Marion L.
AU - Cotarla, Ion
AU - Deeken, John
AU - He, Aiwu Ruth
AU - Hwang, Jimmy
AU - Malik, Shakun
AU - Firozvi, Kashif
AU - Liu, Minetta
AU - Elston, Beth
AU - Strychor, Sandy
AU - Egorin, Merrill J.
AU - Marshall, John L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We would like to thank Novartis for funding this clinical trial. Jan H. Beumer (JHB) and Merrill J. Egorin (MJE) were supported by grant P30-CA47904 from the National Cancer Institute. JHB is the recipient of a Hillman Fellows for Innovative Cancer Research Award. MJE is the recipient of an American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Foundation Translational Research Professorship.
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Purpose Pre-clinical data suggest that combining imatinib with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy may improve imatinib efficacy. We conducted a Phase I study of imatinib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods Patients were accrued to the study in a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients were restaged every two cycles, and those with stable disease (SD), or better, continued study treatment without interruption. Maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) and pharmacokinetic profiles of combination imatinib and paclitaxel were assessed. Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, including 40 in the Phase I dose escalation portion. Alternating dose escalation of imatinib and paclitaxel on a 28-day cycle resulted in MTDs of 800 mg imatinib daily, on days 1-4, 8-11, 15-18, and 22-25, and 100 mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly, on days 3, 10, and 17. Two expansion cohorts, comprising 10 breast cancer patients and 8 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, were enrolled at the MTDs. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms (64 %) and nausea/vomiting (71 %). The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26 %), flu-like symptoms (12 %), and pain (12 %). There were no relevant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug when given in combination compared with alone. Thirty-eight subjects were evaluable for response, 18 (47.4 %) of whom experienced clinical benefit. Five patients (13.2 %) had a partial response (PR) and 13 patients (34.2 %) had SD; the average time to progression in those with clinical benefit was 17 weeks (range: 7-28 weeks). Conclusions This combination of imatinib and paclitaxel was reasonably safe and tolerable, and demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity. Further exploration in diseasespecific Phase II trials is warranted.
AB - Purpose Pre-clinical data suggest that combining imatinib with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy may improve imatinib efficacy. We conducted a Phase I study of imatinib in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Methods Patients were accrued to the study in a standard 3 + 3 design. Patients were restaged every two cycles, and those with stable disease (SD), or better, continued study treatment without interruption. Maximally tolerated doses (MTDs) and pharmacokinetic profiles of combination imatinib and paclitaxel were assessed. Results Fifty-eight patients were enrolled, including 40 in the Phase I dose escalation portion. Alternating dose escalation of imatinib and paclitaxel on a 28-day cycle resulted in MTDs of 800 mg imatinib daily, on days 1-4, 8-11, 15-18, and 22-25, and 100 mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly, on days 3, 10, and 17. Two expansion cohorts, comprising 10 breast cancer patients and 8 patients with soft-tissue sarcomas, were enrolled at the MTDs. The most common adverse events were flu-like symptoms (64 %) and nausea/vomiting (71 %). The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (26 %), flu-like symptoms (12 %), and pain (12 %). There were no relevant differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug when given in combination compared with alone. Thirty-eight subjects were evaluable for response, 18 (47.4 %) of whom experienced clinical benefit. Five patients (13.2 %) had a partial response (PR) and 13 patients (34.2 %) had SD; the average time to progression in those with clinical benefit was 17 weeks (range: 7-28 weeks). Conclusions This combination of imatinib and paclitaxel was reasonably safe and tolerable, and demonstrated evidence of anti-tumor activity. Further exploration in diseasespecific Phase II trials is warranted.
KW - Imatinib
KW - Paclitaxel
KW - Phase I
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871200729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871200729&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00280-012-1969-9
DO - 10.1007/s00280-012-1969-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 23014737
AN - SCOPUS:84871200729
SN - 0344-5704
VL - 70
SP - 843
EP - 853
JO - Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
JF - Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology
IS - 6
ER -